Corrie Sanders vs Nate Tubbs

Uh, not hardly. Think this one through with me HG. Purrity is a better contender than many of Norton's victims who were considered contenders, because like them, he had a ton of losses, but unlike them, he had a better win than any of them (Wlad) and some other good wins and draws.

Sanders has a much better overall record than Purrity, and much better performances against the ATG's he faced. AND he beats Purrity.

Ergo, Purrity is in line with the LeDoux's of the world while Sanders is in line with the Nortons.

Release your hatred, HG, it only blinds you, you'll feel so much better!

 

ok ATG-killer. you certainly claim that.

so you are trying to prove hes the next step down, HoF.

to be fair he is HoF but a backdoor one. Famous for, despite being unable when prime to land a title shot, was suddenly able in the klitshko era in his worst post retirement form ever to land not just one but TWO title shots, winning one of them.

though to be fair, anyone semi good from the lewis era would have yielded the same result against the K bros, probably going one better and unifying the titles.

 

he thinks you mght be wlad.

 

what, because you want it to be so?

fat chance.

purity is a glorifed journeyman, hes not a yardstick for greatness.

they are polar opposites. retired old sanders EASILY wiped out in seconds a weak but prime champ, near prime Norton got a contentious break against arguably the greatest ever during his pomp, and only got a title handed to him later on.

I have no problem with the K bros, only the foolery of some of their fans.

 

an activity you appear to have knowledge of.

 

Answers above.

 

RIP Sanders

BUT run that by me again - why do we have to become pro boxers and why do we have to get shot in order to use a forum on boxing? Bit of a tall order mate. Perhaps you should lead the way.
Do we have to become pro boxers (as well as err..take a bullet) JUST FOR MAKING POSTS ON THIS THREAD, or is it for ANY THREAD where your feelings might get hurt over wlad and corrie?

umm the thread is about corrie sanders. how do you not mention him in a thread about him.

can we not mention any other boxer who has died?

 

theyre not answers.

you want them to be so hard though.

 

Great comeback! I give logic and facts, you give unsupported assertions! Let go that hate HG, I know there's a heart and a brain in there somewhere!

 

thanks for the answers that were disproved the first time you wrote them anyway.

 

Except they never were. You see, you need to do more than say "that's not true" to disprove something.

 

good thing I've never said "that's not true" or any paraphrase of it then eh

 

Uh, actually that's absolutely ALL you said. Variations on that, at least.

 

ironically, that's not true!

I can see why you reduce all counterarguments made against you to that though, its a great get out clause for you to exit a discussion you are losing.

 

I give you that you are a funny troller, HG. You consistently use the tactic of arguing that you have made an argument, while never actually quite revealing that argument.

How about this, why don't you tell me what your brilliant arguments are, so I can shoot them down (yet again)