lol you are an idiot, the heavyweight division today is considered the weakest in it's history. The boxers today are out of shape and lack world class skills, and you want to talk about size, most of the top 10 heavyweights today are 6'1 or 6'2. Ali is 6'3 1/2 with 80", and he didn't have pop? Ali was one of the hardest hitters during his time, he probably didn't hit as hard as Foreman or Fraizer, but he had some SERIOUS pop. Also Ali weighed never weighed below 200lbs after he beat Archie Moore. Ali would walk around 230 and easily shed off 20lbs. Ali back then was in tremendous shape.
"Ali was one of the hardest hitters during his time, he probably didn't hit as hard as Foreman or Fraizer, but he had some SERIOUS pop. " No way Ali was hard puncher. He was technically skilled with exellent speed, but his punch was not hard at all
No it isn't. The division was weaker during Jack Johnson's, Joe Louis', Rocky Marciano's, Larry Holmes' & arguably Mike Tyson's eras to name a few. The Klitschkos and David Haye are always in shape and they are the 3 top rated Heavyweights. There goes your theory about how most of today's top 10 Heavys are short and/or out of shape.
The argument against the Klitschkos are often their losses. On his worst nights, Wlad lost to three fighters Ali would own, but even on those nights,Wlad would not have struggled with Douglas and Cooper, like Ali did. On his best night, Wlad would be a very difficult for Ali, Wlad is fast for his size and harder to hit that he gets credit for.