hmm I wouldn't pay much to see these two fight none challenging opponents in comeback fights. But I'm happy about them being on the same card.
Why not have them fight at the same venue? Also it's getting annoying having to watch the top fighters take so many damn tune up fights, first they need a tune up before a big fight then they need a tune up after the big fight....atsch
Pavlik and Rubio looks to be a bit of a mismatch. Rubio isn't bad just a bad mix for Pavlik. Jennings does nothing for me. Now Cintron or Karass makes for a good fight. Bring one of those guys on and you have a good card.
I'll laugh my ass off if Rubio beats Pavlik. For like a week straight. I may need oxygen administered by a medical staff.
Damned. I wonder if I'll even be able to get a ticket. On the upside, he could probably raise ticket prices a little bit since folks won't have to pay travel and lodging.
This is not PPV quality, but I'll probably split the price with my brother and sister, so what the hell; that's about $17 bucks each, and my sis always cooks a great meal. Unlike a lot of mandatories we see I do think Rubio earned his shot, but he's no match for Pavlik.
I'm in the same boat as these are two of my brother and my favorite fighters at the moment. They are both coming off of defeats; Cotto fighting for an abandoned belt probably to make the Margarito rematch more attractive (like we need any incentive to buy the rematch) and Pavlik facing his mandatory. I'm assuming Kelly paid his belt fees... Anyone hear?