Cotto Canelo, the WBC and the Rematch Clause...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cisco Route, Nov 17, 2015.


Page 1 of 3
  1. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    I'm not aware of the details regarding the contract between Cotto and Canelo but I suspect Cotto, being the "A" side in this equation, has a rematch clause in case he loses. So, if Canelo wins, and Cotto has the option for an immediate rematch, the WBC will just end up having to strip Canelo too. Win or lose, Bumlovkin is deinied his big fight but gets to collect a worthless WBC strap as a consolation prize. Looks to me like the WBC is backing the wrong horse in this race. Their actions here just don't make any good business sense. Especially considering that the possibility of a Mayweather Cotto rematch still exists...
     
    Cisco Route, Nov 17, 2015
    Cisco Route, Nov 17, 2015
    #1
  2. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,715
    9,943
    Jan 27, 2014
    Like someone said on a different thread, maybe Cotto didn't pay the sanctioning fees. It doesn't make sense that Cotto paid the sanctioning fees and then the WBC stripped him.
     
    cslb, Nov 17, 2015
    cslb, Nov 17, 2015
    #2
  3. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,171
    27,890
    Jan 18, 2010
    Indeed Cotto got stripped...

    No sanction fees?
    No mandatory WADA drugtesting?
    :blood
     
    Robney, Nov 17, 2015
    Robney, Nov 17, 2015
    #3
  4. The Shockmaster

    The Shockmaster SOG has 4 children...he pulls out of nothing banned Full Member

    23,047
    1,067
    Apr 19, 2014
    end result is still either

    A - canelo holds belt hostage from ggg after this
    B- ggg fights c level bum for vacant title and nobody gives a damn except his superfanboys who have a hard on for the title
     
    The Shockmaster, Nov 17, 2015
    The Shockmaster, Nov 17, 2015
    #4
  5. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,171
    27,890
    Jan 18, 2010
    WBC's stance
    If Canelo wins (wich I think he does) he has to comply to fighting Golovkin or be stripped.
    If Cotto wins, he will remain stripped and Golovkin will be elevated to full champion
     
    Robney, Nov 17, 2015
    Robney, Nov 17, 2015
    #5
  6. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,737
    81,050
    Aug 21, 2012
    Cool. Get the 154 fighters out of 160
     
    BCS8, Nov 17, 2015
    BCS8, Nov 17, 2015
    #6
  7. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,906
    45
    Jul 12, 2013
    :deal:deal:deal I saw him post this eariler and was going to correct him as well.
     
    Capt, Nov 17, 2015
    Capt, Nov 17, 2015
    #7
  8. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    ^This!
     
    Hookie, Nov 17, 2015
    Hookie, Nov 17, 2015
    #8
  9. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,344
    7,919
    Sep 2, 2011
    WBC shouldn't be thinking what's good business for them but I guess that's just the way things are.

    Some people think that even if Canelo wins the title and refuses to play ball and face his mandatory, WBC will not strip him. That's a possiblity though it would show the joke state that this sport is in, that's for sure.

    You can call it meaningless or whatever but at least the belt will be free of those who have no interest in facing the best in their division at the proper weight limit.
     
    Cafe, Nov 17, 2015
    Cafe, Nov 17, 2015
    #9
  10. DLX

    DLX Member Full Member

    126
    0
    Sep 27, 2013
    There is no rematch clause. Canelo wanted one and Cotto didn't.
     
    DLX, Nov 17, 2015
    DLX, Nov 17, 2015
    #10
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,532
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    Same thing happened with Martinez.

    Golovkin will get the belts but he won't get the championship, not unless he faces the winner.

    Jones unified WBC, WBA, IBF and never was LHW champion, this is the same thing.
     
    lufcrazy, Nov 17, 2015
    lufcrazy, Nov 17, 2015
    #11
  12. flashy k.o

    flashy k.o Supporter of E.E fighters Full Member

    15,275
    75
    Oct 21, 2011
    spot on !:good
     
    flashy k.o, Nov 17, 2015
    flashy k.o, Nov 17, 2015
    #12
  13. moparfan

    moparfan ESB's glass jawed fraud Full Member

    21,942
    2,042
    Jul 13, 2012
    Exactly
     
    moparfan, Nov 17, 2015
    moparfan, Nov 17, 2015
    #13
  14. moparfan

    moparfan ESB's glass jawed fraud Full Member

    21,942
    2,042
    Jul 13, 2012
    :clap: :clap: :clap:
     
    moparfan, Nov 17, 2015
    moparfan, Nov 17, 2015
    #14
  15. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Which is what they've repeated probably 1,000 flipping times the last few months.
     
    abuffy, Nov 17, 2015
    abuffy, Nov 17, 2015
    #15
Page 1 of 3