Cotto can't beat Floyd ...

All your posts regarding Floyd are a load of hot air, there is no substance to them whatsoever

Collazo held an alphabet, so what? Mosley, Judah and Quintana are better opponents are they not? Please tell me you can see that in your desperate attempt to covertly boost Mayweather's resume by talking like Hatton is the second coming of christ

The only thing left to say is that Cotto is the most deserving fighter out there, and it will be even more evident once he's beaten up Margarito, and I can't wait for your bull**** talk then.

 

When did Ali serve time?

What was Robinson's trouble?

Leonard wasn't doing drugs when he lost to Duran.

Tyson was favored to blow out Holyfield and wasn't worried about prison or drugs at that time

 

on points, by stoppage or by DQ.

 

Technical pressure. Not that wading in with no jab brawling that Hatton does. There is a world of difference between the two.

 

I'd like to ask you the same question. I happen to agree that Floyd would beat Cotto, but I'd like to see more of an explanation of how from you because most of your posts have more to do with talking Mayweather up rather than breaking the fight down technically.

 

I agree, but I don't think Floyd would be cruising to a victory. Cotto has the tools to beat him, but Mayweather's style is suited to pick Cotto's style apart in the long run.

I see Cotto taking the lead in the early rounds, doing a good job staying focussed, jabbing and throwing a few combinations. Mayweather will take some time measuring, and getting used to Cotto's ring movement and fighting rythm. By round 4/5 we'll see Mayweather throwing some flush counter shots, and he'll win these rounds. 6/7/8/9 are gonna be close because of Cotto's effective aggresiveness and pressuring and Mayweather's solid countering and accuracy. Most points will probably go to Floyd though, I think he's gonna try and make a statement by putting some effort in it. The most important factor though, are the late rounds. Floyd will win those rounds.

116-112 Mayweather

 

:good
Im afraid his answer will be along the lines of "Floyd is really really good, and Cotto is really really bad"
Cotto does have a fair chance to win because
1. He applies good pressure, but he comes in with the jab, a great way to come in without getting tagged much on the way. Plus he keeps his hands up
2. He has 12 round stamana, a huge plus
3. He hits vary hard. Floyd likes to give his opponets his sholder to hit. Well that shoulder might be dislocated after 12 rounds of Cotto pounding on it. He has a good chance of really hurting Mayweather.
Im not saying Cotto will win, but he does have a chance. You seem to think that no one in history can beat him

 

this statement i agree with 100% .

and not to mention if cotto keeps winning the fight will get bigger

 

Of course it is all speculation, thats why we want the fight 2 happen... you can disredit anyone's opinion by saying it's speculation, but if u dont care about their opinion why would we care about yours?

 

Overlooking someone is not out of the ring distraction.

Ali was well past any type of punishment and had already begun his comeback for the big payday with Frazier.

Tyson was geared to destroy Holy from the day Holyfield fought at heavyweight and nothing could distract him from that except Holyfield.

When you become a pro fighter you have to assume responsibility for your career. Taking people lightly is up to the individual. I don't think Marvin Hagler EVER was distracted but he did lose some fights.

I am glad however that you have said that Mayweather is not susceptible to distractions. I figure that if he loses to Cotto or Margo or De La Hoya, distractions is what all the fans will be crying. Involved in WWE, Filthy Rich records, promoting fights, family squabbles. Now we see by what you say that Floyd need not worry about such things.