Cotto\Clottey unification in TROUBLE because of the IBF mandatory!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rudyard, Apr 7, 2009.


  1. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    I've read this article about the IBF is pushing for Clottey to fight his mandatory Issac Hlatshwayo... Clottey is most likely to give up his belt to persue the match up with Cotto.

    Lets just hope and pray that the match is still on!:thumbsup
     
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Free Smurk

    124,279
    36,547
    Jun 23, 2005
    Don't worry Clottey will vacate and fight Cotto instead.
     
  3. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    Dammit, I wanted a unification bout...
     
  4. Arriba

    Arriba Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,148
    6
    Jun 30, 2007
    Right. There might not be unification but they're still gonna mix it up.

    Anyways what are the odds Judah or Kermit Cintron winds up in the vacated title fight?
     
  5. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    He'll fight Cotto anyway as Pimp said, but it's stupid. I'm fed up with this, seems to be an excuse to stop Cotto unifying the division, same happened with Margocheato and his WBO belt.
     
  6. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    I could care less about the titles on the line. Fighting Cotto would generate much more money for Clottey so if he has to I'm sure he'd give up the belt for a shot at Miguel.
     
  7. Pimp C

    Pimp C Free Smurk

    124,279
    36,547
    Jun 23, 2005
    Probably pretty high. They both get more chances than they deserve.
     
  8. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    I understand that the fight will go on...The point is, how in the hell can we have a unified champ when the organization is trying to pull stupid anitcs like the IBF is trying to do to Clottey...I mean come on, they can at least let the unification happen and just let Issac fight the winner...That sounds like a good solution IMO but I guess the IBF thinks differently.
     
  9. Arriba

    Arriba Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,148
    6
    Jun 30, 2007
    I can see it now: Zab Judah vs Issac Hlatswayo for the IBF Title

    Winner faces Kermit Cintron
     
  10. Arriba

    Arriba Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,148
    6
    Jun 30, 2007
    They don't want unification though. That's why you get sh*t like this.
     
  11. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Took the words right out of my mouth!:lol:
     
  12. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Exactly....The IBF should have at least could have been more vocal about the whole situation before the fight was signed....None the less though, us fans are getting one hell of a fight regardless of the outcome of the situation.:good
     
  13. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Ewwwwww...
     
  14. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    If you go to the IBF website, you'll see that they have specific language that states unification bouts take priority over Mandos. Margo was never stripped of his title, he agreed to give it up at the request of Arum. I'm not sure what's going on here. Someone may have jumped the gun with this story. The IBF isn't always up to date. They may have issued this request for a purse bid without knowing that the Clottey/Cotto fight was finalized(it took them months to figure out Guzman was suspeneded).
     
  15. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    No doubt.