How is that possible? He was in the top 10 before the Margarito fight. As soon as he looses they completely take him out of the p4p rankings. Then he beats Jennings and they put him in back at number 7, then he gets a decision with on of the most avoided fighters at 147 and he drops to number 9 in p4p rankings.
Thats P4P rankings for you. One win and a fighter is top 5, one loss and he's outside the top 10. Those ranking have always been too kneejerk.
P4P concept is bull****. It could be also called MY FAVORITE boxers list. There is not criteria to know if winning against a guy at 147lbs is any better than against a guy at 175lbs or at 122lbs. Its just opinion. In many cases, they use this lists just to sell fights. Cotto is a TOP 5 @ welterweights, period.
Sometimes in victory or close fight you lose even when you win... **** happens, Don't dwell on it too much. Everyone knows Cotto is one of the best. That's all that matters.
agreed, IMO way too much emphasis on pound for pound lists and your right, the criteria for choosing it goes more like a popularity contest as some fighters can dominate weak divisions and find themselves on the list, where other pound for pound candidates can take tougher bouts, and actually lose ranking (Cotto) go figure.
I know Izzy and Marquez can keep fighting each other forever and they would still be ahead of most fighters. And then you have Cotto who fights the best in his division. And fights every kind of style but goes down.
when you're a top 10 p4p fighter (A level), you are expected to dominate lower class opposition. clottey at most is B+. so, maybe the Ring expected cotto to win convincingly and not just via a close split decision. that's probably why he dropped a few places. at least, he's still in the top 10.
hmm says... ok that makes a little more sense, but some fighters on that list have fought B lvl fighters and moved up or stayed where they were, but I guess that goes with how you perform.