Cotto-Geale Clash Will Head To Barclays on June 6th

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by a beast, Apr 13, 2015.


Page 6 of 6
  1. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    I don't mind catchweight fights, but they should never be for titles. In fact, the sanctioning bodies should ban the use of catchweights for title defenses.
     
    demigawd, Apr 14, 2015
    demigawd, Apr 14, 2015
    #76
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    I knew Cotto would refuse to fight Golovkin........................hell, Golovkin has already knocked Geale out, so then Cotto fights Geale? The fans want to see Golovkin Vs. Cotto..................
     
    Farmboxer, Apr 14, 2015
    Farmboxer, Apr 14, 2015
    #77
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,549
    83,378
    Nov 30, 2006
    This actually isn't a bad fight and is much better than many of those bandied about recently as possibilities for Cotto's next lineal MW title defense, in fact - but I'm just not that excited about it. :?
     
    IntentionalButt, Apr 14, 2015
    IntentionalButt, Apr 14, 2015
    #78
  4. Dos Huevos

    Dos Huevos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,742
    11
    Aug 28, 2014
    Catchweight Cokehole!
     
    Dos Huevos, Apr 14, 2015
    Dos Huevos, Apr 14, 2015
    #79
  5. like a boss

    like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,568
    8,843
    Jul 30, 2012
    Hard to disagree with that. The fact Cotto wants it at catch weight shows he thinks Geale is a threat. Otherwise he would have just fought him at the stipulated limit.
     
    like a boss, Apr 17, 2015
    like a boss, Apr 17, 2015
    #80
Page 6 of 6