I think cotto is one of the most solid welterweight and I think that if it continues well as for 2009 must be the king of that weight without a doubt its demonstrations in every squabble continue to grow increasingly pleiador their skills is a very complete and should do the remaining fights as soon as possible as it has said it will not q boxing more after 30 years and is a very sure what he tells you to think:bbb
Si quieres cambiar la foto, esto es lo que debes hacer: 1. ve a user CP 2. ve a donde dice edit avatar 3. marca use custom avatar 4. escojes la foto que quieras en axaminar
I WOULDN'T consider him one of the greats just yet. However, his resume and list of wins is comparable to another Puerto Rican in Edwin Rosario. And Rosario is a HOFer.
there must be a misunderstanding, I am saying that he is a great champ at this moment in WW, not mean to consider him an all time great yet
This is a tough one to call Mayweather beat De La Hoya more decisevely than Cotto beat Mosley despite the split decision verdict. In the first 6 rounds of the fight, Cotto looked more impressive against Mosley than Floyd did in the last 6 against De La Hoya. Mosley probably had more in the tank than De La Hoya, not to mention he was the more active fighter. But at the same time, Mayweather was new to the 154 pound weight class while Oscar had been there for quite some time. As much as I want to say Cotto's win, I believe Floyd's win over De La Hoya was better. Which win do you consider better?