Cotto: "I felt really good at that weight [145]. It wasn't a problem for me."

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by josak, Dec 24, 2009.


  1. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009
    is cotto like oscar who can generate alot of money??if its not then why would pac fight him without title..its cotto who wanted pac first so it is implied that he should go down to 140 and guess what happened?? didnt pac move up to 145 instead while cotto going down only 1 pound
     
  2. banditking

    banditking New Member Full Member

    20
    0
    Dec 5, 2008
    what's clear on that fight is that cotto moved much faster than he ever had
    and it's pretty much visible during the early rounds, so i guess weighing less somehow benefited him
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pacquiao went up 5 pounds, Cotto went down 2. Pretty fair. Slight edge to Cotto.
     
  4. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    Please do some research and you'll see that around 80% of catchweight fights were won by the naturally bigger fighter!!!:deal:deal:deal
     
  5. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    cotto went down 1 :deal:deal:deal
     
  6. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,296
    15,133
    Dec 6, 2008
    I now respect Cotto even more. The fight really should have been at 147 though.
     
  7. servo

    servo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,753
    31
    Jul 13, 2009
    I thought he weighed in at 147 for Clottey?
     
  8. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,149
    10,574
    Jul 28, 2009
    I believe it was 146. So one pound wasn't much. And yes, at first Cotto did refuse to put his title on the line during negotiations and I thought that was fine but they both agreed and Cotto confirmed he wasn't weight drained at 145, I guess, so good for Cotto. This was a great achievement by Pac, catchweight or not. Fair play.
     
  9. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    i trust the word of the joy boys who say cotto was weight drained more than cotto himself.
     
  10. servo

    servo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,753
    31
    Jul 13, 2009
    Ah yeah it was Clottey who was at 147, got mixed up. I agree then, I don't think the catchweight drained him.. he did look very good at the weight. And yeah fair play from him for not making excuses !
     
  11. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    No doubt we'll still get idiots saying 'Cotto was weight drained' :lol:
     
  12. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    He was still far too drained, he could barely make it to the ring. Morales, Marquez, Barrera, Hatton, DLH, Valuev and all the drained crew had to carry him in there.
     
  13. Xavier

    Xavier Boxing Logician Full Member

    1,260
    3
    Aug 15, 2008

    :rofl


    I see you're starting to develop a sense of humour about all of this :lol:
     
  14. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    If you discount the stuff that Pacquiao took away from Cotto, I thought Cotto looked really good.

    That wasn't no watered-down or shot-to-**** version of Miguel Cotto. It was the real deal. Pacquiao is just that good.
     
  15. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    You are so wrong it's unbelievable. I'm not saying the 145 catchweight had a huge impact on Cotto at all, but how the hell did it favour him? Pac fought Oscar at 147 because Oscar was absolutely dead at the weight. The 145 catchweight and all the terms of the fight were to suit Pacquiao - Arum's cash-cow. Of course it wasn't to benefit Cotto, that's ridiculous.