faie enuff i can agree with this but looking around esb people have been gassed up on hbo commentary, i dont how this permance proves margarito cheated pacquaio knock out alot of people in 2008 to but he not doing so in the latst couple of years does dat mean heis gloves was loaded their is no logic from hbo.
note the "" the people who complain about "running" are the same people who complain about boxers like hatton blocking punches with his face they just complain about everything
whats the speechmarks supposed to mean? are you quoting someone? you can outbox withour running like marquez did, like pernell used to do, like cotto did to alfonso gomez. Dont call running boxing, it's not.
They're not fans/supporters of the sport they're just haters. Remind me of some middle aged wives that complain about everything.
Running suggests you are not engaging a fighter and are simply trying to stay away. Cotto was creating openings, giving angles, and using footwork. Claiming he was running is pure nonsense
cotto beat the shity out of margo but he did do some running and i didn't see the thread starter write what you put speechmarks on a spade is a spade, running is running.
Shut your ****ing piehole you disgraceful Pac bumlicker, and sort out that appalling vCash while you're at it. :deadatsch
Um... It turns out, Cotto fought Margarito 1st and left his right eye suspect and tender for Pacquaio. Don't rewrite history son. Cotto V Margarito 1 was a brutal fight for BOTH guys. It's already understood that after the Cotto 1 fight, Marg's eye would never be the same. We don't need steroids and mystery shakes in PR. :hi: