Cotto or Mayweather: Who has the better resume at welterweight.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boom_Boom, Sep 13, 2010.


  1. bandido

    bandido The Black Bandit Full Member

    6,638
    2
    Feb 25, 2010
    definitely cotto
     
  2. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Since two of Mayweather wins were over LINEAR CHAMPS (Baldomir, Mosley) than its Mayweather all day.
     
  3. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,465
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    Are you referring to Judah? Floyd beat him too. :lol:
     
  4. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    Very smart man right here. Cotto sadly is a fighter who probably has earned the most vacant titles out of any fighter in the last decade. The man couldn't take a champs belt to save his own soul. This is just another thread to troll Floyd and it's quite tedious.
     
  5. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
  6. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    Looking at the age both fought them at, and the natural weights of heir opponents, I have to say Cotto
     
  7. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    Cotto you know why, because he fought Pac!
     
  8. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    :roflI love your avatar.
     
  9. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Cotto is a warrior's warrior. He reminds me of an old school guy like Arguello or Lopez. When push comes to shove he'll take on a challenge rather than an easy fight. Cotto does not hesitate to fight bigger guys, faster guys, stronger guys, or guys who have more boxing skill.

    Floyd?:think

    Not so much.:nono
     
  10. Starched Him

    Starched Him Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,681
    61
    Feb 5, 2009
    when you put this together I guess maybe they should fight to find out but we do know whos better and who will win but oh well
     
  11. Pax

    Pax Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,480
    0
    Apr 21, 2010
    To the true unbias boxing fan it is an obvious answer:
    It's a very close call, an argument can be made for either reasoning but regradless it is very close.
    To the obsessed *******s and folmos they only know how to post in regards to endlessly trying to discredit the other's accomplishments. Reading through the respondes you can easily tell who is answering as a nut hugger and who is answering the question logically.
    To post either's resume is "soft" or "horrible" just shows how blided you are by your obession.
    Kinda sad to see
     
  12. Pax

    Pax Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,480
    0
    Apr 21, 2010
    I totally agree
     
  13. Pax

    Pax Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,480
    0
    Apr 21, 2010
    SSM's layoff doesn't tell the whole story:
    1- He was coming off destroying marg in impressive fashion
    2- He had a productive training camp leading into the berto fight before it was canceled, this is not a true layoff. SSM was traing and dieting as if he had a fight to prepare for. if anything I see this as an advantage for SSM leading into the pbf fight
     
  14. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Yet when Cotto fought Judah it was one of the best wins in the history of boxing. Oh by the way dickhead, Cotto's biggest win at welterweight is against a grandpa. :lol: