Cotto suprised by Pac...in his refusal

if pac tested positive i would laugh so hard for days...it would be like christmas watching the *******s make excuses....OH YEAH WELL UMMM FLOYD WANTS TO FIGHT HATTON!!!! UMMM HE SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN FORCED TO PROVE HIS INNOCENCE!!! UMMMM HE IS STILL GOD!!!!!! UMMM.....:huh:|

 

Come on man, this is not even serious. I'll say it again, Pacquiao and his team have ****ed up, it's not Cotto's or anybody else's fault and you know it.

 

Should Void be banned from boxing because he has chicken blood?

 

Couldn't have said it better.

 

No they havent ****ed up according to most American media. You do know that PACs not even American right?

 

Of course Cotto's surprised.

Most people are.

 

But what does that mean? Mayweather generally isn't a likeable fighter even in the US, BigReg even told you the writer you mentioned has a long time bias towards Mayweather. In this case one doesn't need the media to form an opinion, and many fans' opinion is that Pac has ****ed it up. There's no convincing reason to not want to take this test and act the way Pac has acted.

 

Void wants to make big money without fighting.

 

This is what Im telling you. Americans are 50/50 on PAc and Floyd. Arguably Pacs more popular with White Americans than Floyd, He certainly has more Mexican fans and I would even exclude Asians. This is just America..

Asia has 3 Billion in population. Now I think you are Greek and you should know Mathematics. This doesnt add up. Floyd is the one thats going to look bad.

 

Void was already looking bad. Void wants to save face.

 

Man, this is not the point. I don't believe that what the majority thinks must be the right thing. It's not a popularity contest. Even if 3 billion people think that Mayweather is the one to blame, I think it's pretty clear that team Pac's actions have no logical explanation and are just wrong.

Instead of giving me a reason why Pac has that much of a problem with random testing, you're giving me statistics about how many people are on each side. You are a good an objective poster and I really didn't expect you to be so biased on this one.

 

What?? ok Why would the king of Boxing (p4p#1) listen to unfounded accusations by a crackhead and give in to their demands?

PAC has mentioned that hed take a BLOOD test 30 days out (while in training which the benefit is at its highest) and right after the fight.

Since you are very biased, why is Floyd asking this and trying to change the rules of the sport? For the better?? really? No ones guilty.

 

Yeah i'm a bit confused of whats going on right now. Can someone tell me why they can't just agree to random blood testing with no tests done during night time and a cut-off date of one week? Is it because the NSAC will not due this?:think

 

Ah, so Pac not agreeing to random testing is because he's too proud to do so? Give me a break. This is the kind of bull**** that makes team Pac sound completely irrational. Pride, fear of needles and fear that giving blood will weaken him? Seriously??? Does this really convince you and do you realise how ridiculous these excuses sound? And since when asking for random blood testing is "changing the rules of the sport"?

I really don't know why mate. I'm puzzled just as you are.

 

Should I ever be pulled over on suspicion of DUI I will refuse a breathalyzer on the basis that it is an insult to my pride. After all, I have never been caught driving drunk before, so why should I submit to baseless and demeaning testing. I can only assume, since personal pride is a perfectly valid and legitimate reason to refuse a test, that there will be no legal repercussions for this, and that I will not be hauled to the jail straightaway and forced to submit to a bloodtest.

I will also demand that any future employers employ me without any requirements for passing a drug test since there is no law requiring me to pass such a test to secure employment. I will then sue said potential employer for not hiring me, based on the idea that their request that I take a drug test, and refusal to hire me unless I did so, is an attack on my good character.

Obviously none of this behavior would be in any way indicative of having something to hide.