Cotto vs Hatton

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by m.s., Nov 11, 2010.


  1. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    It would be a shoot out at either weight in my opinion.

    I'd favour Hatton at 140 and Cotto at 147, but both fights can go either way.

    Hatton doesn't like it to the body, Cotto doesn't like being made to fight three minutes of every round.

    Both have strengths that they can use to exploit the other's weaknesses.
     
  2. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    Hatton doesnt punch hard enough to hurt Cotto at 140 weight drained or not
     
  3. Johnstown

    Johnstown Boxing Addict banned

    5,695
    12
    Aug 30, 2010
    And Paulie Maginillia is? Seriously...Paulie ****ing staggered Cotto..
    Hatton wasn't a great one punch hitter..but he wasn't bad...good enough to break Casteos ribs...and definitly hitting harder then Paulie (please don't come back with "but Paulie hit harder before he injured his hands" no he didn't hit harder..his lack of knockouts tells you that.
     
  4. mike_bngs

    mike_bngs Active Member Full Member

    943
    2
    Nov 8, 2008
    Its a proven fact that Hatton had no business up at ww, but at lww Hatton would edge Cotto. Ricky would outwork Cotto and hit him as hard as he was ever hit at 140.
     
  5. DannyL12345

    DannyL12345 Active Member Full Member

    766
    2
    Nov 2, 2010
    Gotta go with Cotto both ways.
     
  6. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    140: Hatton would bully the weight-drained Miguel. Hatton UD of late TKO
    147: Cotto sparks Hatton early with vicious body shots. Hatton is uncomfortable at this weight. Cotto TKO win over Hatton.