Cotto vs Margarito

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Nov 14, 2007.


  1. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Who wins?

    How and why?

    Should this fight be made?
     
  2. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    But what about Margarito's uppercuts?

    Does Cotto have an answer for them?
     
  3. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Cotto wins.

    Cotto breaks Margarito down in a come-forward fight via body shots and knocks Margarito out late.

    This fight should not be made. Cotto has bigger fights he should be taking, and Margarito is behind several other fighters in the line. His win this weekend doesn't get him a title shot when there are bigger matches to be made.
     
  4. MacManJr.

    MacManJr. Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,111
    6
    Jul 11, 2007
    Margarito is too easy to hit. If Cotto could outbox Shane going backwards like he did then he would make Margarito look silly and possibly break his ribs.
     
  5. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    That's not necessarily true unless you drop your hands to throw the uppercut.

    Margarito dips his shoulder, which will give Cotto little opportunity to counter Margo off the uppercut.

    You also gotta factor in that Margo can throw the uppercut up close and from a distance.

    And his overhand right is killer. If his last fight was any indication of his own personal, technical improvement, then his punches are a lot straighter than they were before.

    He's tough too, and I think Margarito can handle about any punch. He's as tough as they come.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Margarito is a good fighter but the guy is just crude. Cotto has some sick pop, a quality jab and good hooks to the body.

    Cotto by late round stoppage.
     
  7. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Cotto does have a great jab, but Margarito is a lot bigger than Shane, and I don't think Shane anticipated being the aggressor.

    Margarito makes his living off of hunting his opponents down.

    Boxing Margarito in my opinion, would be the wrong thing to do if you're Cotto, unless you're taking a break and you know Margo is hurt or tired.

    This is unlikely though considering that Margarito throws 80-100 punches a round, and when was the last time you saw Margarito taking a step backwards?

    I've seen Cotto go backwards against Mosley and Urkal.
     
  8. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    He doesn't look crude anymore.

    Sure, against Williams, he looked crude at times, but that's because Williams is almost impossible to hit cleanly, especially considering he's throwing punches constantly.

    So yeah, Margarito looked like he was reaching, but I think Margarito's punches look a lot straighter, his speed is not top notch, but it's still there, and he has a hell of an uppercut.
     
  9. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    I don't think ya'll are giving Margarito enough credit. You can't look at the Williams fight and use that as your basis on how he would perform against Cotto.

    Williams and Cotto are 2 completely different fighters.
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    tbh i haven't seen much of margarito
     
  11. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Going backwards does not equal losing a round, or a fight.
     
  12. MacManJr.

    MacManJr. Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,111
    6
    Jul 11, 2007
    Where in my post did I say anything about Margarito going backwards?
     
  13. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    He didn't lose rounds against Mosley, but he did against Urkal.

    That's not the point though.

    Mosley, while prone to trading at times, is a boxer. He showed this against Cotto.

    Margarito is an aggressive fighter who is BEST when his opponent is going backwards.

    That's when Margarito uses his range, volume, and power to break his opponent down before they can attack.

    There were times when Mosley had Cotto hurt during the fight.

    The difference between Mosley and Margarito is, MARGARITO knows when he needs to finish, and being an aggressive fighter, and ESPECIALLY after hurting Cotto with an uppercut, he would have continued to press the fight.

    Mosley on the other hand was more cautious. Margarito would not be, and I don't think if Cintron can knock Margarito out when he was hurt, Cotto couldn't either, at least not with one punch.

    Margarito is DANGEROUS.

    Hopefully the oddsmakers agree with the majority of the posters on this site. I'll make a killing.

    I love Cotto and it would be great to see him win, but Margarito has the tools and the determination to beat him.
     
  14. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    I didn't say that you did.

    I was saying that Margarito is an aggressive fighter by nature. If he knows that you're hurt or that there is something wrong, he will go after you.

    Cotto whether he was hurt or not in the 9th round changed his gameplan and decided to box Mosley.

    Unless you're a master boxer, this is not a wise thing to do against a pressure fighter like Margarito.
     
  15. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    So Margarito is more dangerous than Mosley and knows when to finish a man better than Mosley?

    Cintron isn't close to being as mentally tough as Cotto, so bringing him in is a moot point.