just as most people said would be the same with cotto/margo? come on if we do have it lets make it with no catch weight even if they fight at welter
:roll: Cotto typically fought at 146 lbs... he only had to shed a single pound to fight Pac at 145 lbs. I seriously doubt that made any kind of a difference.
Would you pay to see Pac-Clottey II? Or Floyd-Ortiz II? I'm pretty sure casual fans wouldn't, at least. Nor would they pay for a Pac-Cotto rematch considering how one-sided their first fight was.
Umm most people here were saying Cotto was gonna beat Margo, especially because of the condition of Margo's eye...
I seriously doubt Pacquiao would fight Cotto at 154lbs...If its at 147lbs, even with no catchweight, Manny beats him again...Bad style match up for Cotto...Cotto aint no Marquez. :deal
Margaritos' plasters diminished cotto's punch resistance that was the difference in the pacquiao fight. If he cant take a punch that wont change, time has passed maybe he had time to recuperated but i doubt it. :hat
^ This. Cotto looked great last night, but a non-plastered Margo is just a tough punching bag, with a thick skull & tiny brain. Pac may also lack some defense, but he's still an offensive monster, and Cotto is not a hard puncher.
margocheato didn't have his bricks this time:deal catchweight or not pac whoop cotto's ass again. like i said i rather see pac-mayweather and cotto-canelo