Cotto was an undefeated fighter when he fought Floyd.

Floyd's been doping since he moved to the welterweight division.

:deal

 

No he wasn't and both Margo and Pac beat him better.

Try a little bit harder next time.

 

I'm an undefeated fighter.

 

Poor trolling attempt, try harder next time Scott

 

Exactly wraps aside Cotto lost to a Clean Margacheato

And lost to a Clean Pacquio

We don't know what kind of PED's fraud was on for his fight with Cotto since he was tested by Unada

 

Even if it were established that Margarito carried plaster into the ring and Pacquiao was roided to the gills, how does Mayweather beating a fighter ruined by those cheats make it a great win for him.

When a fighter gets beatdown the way Cotto got beatdown by Margarito and Pacquiao, that fighter doesn't come out of that the same whether the beatdowns were aided by cheating or not.

Try again!

 

The irony here, of course, is that FLoyd was NOT and undefeated fighter when he fought Cotto. He lost the Castillo fight.

 

Nah, he got beat up and should of arguably lost the Clottey fight.

Cotton was never the same after that brick beating though, no fighter can be. The fact that he still found continued success after the beating of a lifetime shows how much guts Cotton has though.

 

fixed

 

not weight drained alone.
PEDS
no real trainer
no corner.
no S&T coach.

HAVING SAID THAT. although those guys cheated him, they did beat the phawk outta him.
so that is what floyd really dealt with.

 

Floyd's ring attire was a huge dissapointment.

For that reason I scored most rounds against him.

 

he didn't "arguably" lose that fight.
he won that 115-112
mosley had a better argument 115-113
paulie made it REALLY close. 115-112
for all the hate he gets, paulie -prime paulie- was a supreme boxer with one of the biggest hearts and elite skills

 

i liked his outfit for the berto fight.