Mosley looked shot, his balance was awful. Therefore he was throwing arm punches as he could not generate power from the floor up. Also his timing was of so he thew a few right hands all of which hit Cotto high on the head and not one hit him on the button. Cotto deserved the win and showed improved defence but talk of 'erasing the question mark next to Cottos chin' as said by the commentators is bull****. The jury is still out... at least.
I agree Bully with the cotto comment. Although I do like cotto his chin is still suspect Zab had sharp punches but did not throw enough. Shane threw more punches but they were not sharp enough. That is a gross picture Bully.
The way you ****heads talk about chins is ridiculous. Doesn't matter until something actually happens. Even he had a proven china chin, it just makes his achievements more impressive.
The way those ****hed commentators talk about chins is ridiculous. READ THE POST. You can't argue that a weak chin is a disadvantage in boxing, nor can you argue that before the Mosley fight we all knew Cotto seemed weak in this department. All I'm saying is that the Cotto Mosley fight answered a lot of questions but Cottos chin WAS NOT ONE OF THEM AS MOSLEYS BALANCE LOOKED AWFUL AND THEREFORE AFFECTED HIS POWER!
I know: All the talk of fighters chins, losing by ass ****, winning by abuse and any fighter who happens to lose being exposed as a fraud gets my back up too. That wasn't what I was doing though:thumbsup
