Cotto's legacy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Son of Gaul, Feb 18, 2010.


  1. mking

    mking Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,658
    0
    Nov 30, 2007
    He will probably be looked at as a Vargas.
     
  2. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    He wouldn't make the top 50 at WW. But he will be remembered as a good fighter who took on quality fighters and was involved in some nice action fights. Not a bad legacy to leave.
     
  3. ricardoparker93

    ricardoparker93 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,831
    11
    May 30, 2009
    Your a ****ing hater :lol: your statement that he doesnt get in to the top 100 is almost as ridiculous as the earlier claim that he is top 3 all time.
     
  4. 5oh1box

    5oh1box Active Member Full Member

    997
    0
    Dec 2, 2009

    you miss read me bro :nono ...I said he's in MY top 3....MY ...and thats at 147 not all time.
     
  5. darthhutchence

    darthhutchence Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,505
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    Top 60 All-time welter! I can't even say 50.
     
  6. darthhutchence

    darthhutchence Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,505
    0
    Jun 20, 2009

    That sums it up perfect:good
     
  7. 5oh1box

    5oh1box Active Member Full Member

    997
    0
    Dec 2, 2009
    miguel cotto one of the best welteweights ever
     
  8. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005
    He has my respect and would be remember in my book how a true fighter should be. Never made any excuses even in his only two loses were his opponents have raise questions at this point. He fought almost all of them, just a few left, but then again you can't fight them all. Arum did a great job in the beginning, but I feel Arum saw the bigger picture and put Cotto through some fights that could have happen little by little, but they were rush. He was a valiant and brave fighter, who actually care about the fans. During his time fighting he's def. in my top 10 esp. at 147.
     
  9. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005
    I would like to see some of these top 50 welterweights list from some that are posting. I bet I would get a laugh out some of them if posted.:lol:
     
  10. SoxNation

    SoxNation Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    0
    Oct 21, 2009
    I don't think Cotto has much of a legacy. In my opinion, legacies are for the elite. Cotto is a decent fighter, but he was no better than that. His best wins are a gift decision over Clottey and a disputable win over a past prime Mosley. Cotto is more hype than greatness.
     
  11. mightyd40

    mightyd40 Spartan Full Member

    2,264
    13
    Mar 21, 2007
    i think you need a more in depth look at the history of boxing before saying this type of thing.....cotto is a very good fighter and this isnt an attack at him in any way. but there are much better welterweights than him in the long history of boxing.
     
  12. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005

    This was a response to Cotto not even being close top 100 welterweight. I could probably see a reason of him not being consider top 50. I honestly couldn't name 50 welterweights out of my head instantly, without looking for sources or anything like that. But since you have a great depth in boxing probably more than others and me:D, could you please be the first to write down your top 50 welterweight list and educate us a little more. I bet your list would bring a ton of arguments. Im ready for your list, hope you don't keep us waiting:good
     
  13. mightyd40

    mightyd40 Spartan Full Member

    2,264
    13
    Mar 21, 2007
    well my apologies then, i thought you had said cotto was a top 10 welterweight
     
  14. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005
    I said top ten as of right now, not counting guys in the 80's or 90's.
     
  15. mightyd40

    mightyd40 Spartan Full Member

    2,264
    13
    Mar 21, 2007
    yea i guess i should have read it better than that, i have just seen quite a few guys who obviously dont know the history of boxing forgetting that there were fighters before mayweather and pac.