Cotto's resume is no joke.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TroubleLurks, Jul 2, 2009.


  1. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009
    :rofl Keep posting - I cant stop laughing at the ridiculousness of the bull**** you write.
     
  2. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :rofl:rofl:rofl So now people are lying on Margorito now for no apparent reason.:lol:
     
  3. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    If he does beat Pacquiao and Mayweather you could make a case that he is one of the greatest welterweights of all time....maybe not thee best yet, but he definitely will have a case. Beatinh Pacquiao and Mayweather is no easy feat though.
     
  4. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  5. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    co-sign.
     
  6. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Cotto's resume...other than losing that construction gig in vegas becuase he got into a fight with the brick laying dude that was down with his union....its pretty damned impressive I'd hire him, is he looking for work?
     
  7. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    cotto is a true warrior and i love the guy but i don't see him beating pac and certainly not PBF...PBF is FAR to skilled and fast for cotto
     
  8. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    IF that somehow happens he is def ONE of the best...I just don't see it in his skill set and the way he fights but the man is a warrior and if he did he would deserve every accolade he gets
     
  9. wuzupman

    wuzupman Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,508
    0
    Feb 8, 2009
    show me proof that he didn't use plaster, it goes both ways.
     
  10. Dominicano

    Dominicano Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,598
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    That is what so cool about Cotto vs. Pac. Both have great resumes and to add a cotto or a Pac just adds extra gravy to their mash potatoes.
     
  11. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006

    WTF!!!! :lol: :-(

    My proof is that after extensive analisys the CSAC was unable to confirm any kind of plaster was used.
     
  12. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :patsch Does it matter? They found traces of Plaster....I mean how much specific can they be? Its shouldnt have been there in the first place...You fail!:rofl
     
  13. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006

    and im sure Cotto has a much more extensive amateur background than Pac does.

    If Pac retired right now, there is nothing Cotto could do in the next 2 years to match Pac's resume.
     
  14. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,005
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    He could possibly (although highly unlikely)

    Beat Mayweather, Mosley, Margarito, Williams, Chavez Jr., and some other belt holders at 154 and maybe defeat Sturm or some other respectable 160 lber.

    In 2 years?...its possible...but HIGHLY HIGHLY unlikely. But it can be done
     
  15. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    WTF is traces of plaster??? Did they found plaster or not??? Why can't they be clear? Traces of Plaster?