Could any 20-year old fighter beat the Tyson who beat Berbick?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Jul 1, 2008.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,180
    13,182
    Jan 4, 2008
    I would say that the view on Tyson is quite balanced nowadays. Most recognize that he was really great in his prime, and there aren't too many left who insists that "Mega Tyson" was unbeatable either (with notable exceptions). I think the discussion is very balanced around here overall, even if it is a bit less so on some subjects IMO.
     
  2. prime

    prime BOX! Writing Champion Full Member

    2,564
    90
    Feb 27, 2006
    True.

    My personal experience was Tyson's simply looking better on film than hallowed past greats (Tyson over Spinks impressing me more than Louis over Schmeling), discovering this site, reading quite a few dismissive, high-and-mighty opinions on Mike, lowering my opinion of him, feeling like something was amiss suddenly picking 15 guys over Tyson, going back to the film, confirming my prior observations and forever consolidating my respect for this awesome fighter.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,180
    13,182
    Jan 4, 2008
    It's good that you have conviction in your opinions. Many guys here are so knowledgable and argue so well that sometimes you can get to doubt things you really think are self-evident.

    Personally, I have been somewhat guilty of dismissing Tyson in the past, mainly because I was so fed up with those who hyped him. I think he showed true greatness at times (Berbick, Spinks for example), but I also think he showed weaknesses against guys like Douglas and Holyfield that just can't be discarded with "that wasn't the real Tyson". I do agree, however, that Tyson wasn't at his best in those fights. Against Holyfield he was definitely some way past his prime, but so was Holyfield.

    Awesome as he looked in finishing P. Thomas I couldn't help but wonder how the fight would have looked if Thomas had moved more behind that excellent jab and straight right. And it's hard not to feel that the fight against Douglas gave at least some hint to the answer of that question.

    But still, I have Tyson very high in a h2h sense. The only one I would pick quite comfortably over him is Ali, and maybe Foreman.
     
  4. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    I don't think there's ever been a heavyweight of such a young age as great as Tyson was circa 86/87.
     
  5. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Whilst Berbick was the better opponent I've thought for a long time that the most brutal, dominating and sharp Tyson ever looked was perhaps during the Biggs fight. He could've easily forced the stoppage at virtually anytime long before the 7th
     
  6. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    40
    Nov 19, 2004
    I've said before that the Biggs fight is actually one of my favourite Tyson performances because (even if it's just bourne out of wanting to torture Biggs) the more methodical and precise pace Tyson sets in that fight really gave him a chance to show off more than just the bulldozer approach.
     
  7. radianttwilight

    radianttwilight Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,539
    18
    May 5, 2007
    Wanna know something special?

    Spinks 212 for his fight with Tyson.

    Foreman was 217 for his title-winning performance against Frazier in 1973.

    Tyson was 218lbs for the Spinks fight...

    If Michael Spinks wasn't a credible opponent because he was "smaller" than Tyson, then maybe prime Foreman wouldn't be a credible opponent either? Since weight = ability, after all.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,135
    47,108
    Feb 11, 2005
    Let's remember Berbick was a fairly limited and well... crappy heavyweight. And that era was horrible.
     
  9. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Both is wrong, watch Clay-Williams or Louis-Schmeling. Those are nearer on what you suggest.
    Also, Tyson maybe the youngest beltholder ever but when he became champ he was older than Patterson was when he became champ.
     
  10. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006

    I don't think that Ali would show the same clowning and carelessness against Tyson. If he did he'd be in trouble, otherwise he'd win a closely contested UD.
     
  11. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    How many thread topics can be devised to try and manipulate a situation where Tyson is the greatest ever fighter?
     
  12. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Just wait and watch and you´ll see them all. :yep
     
  13. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Tyson certainly ain't the greatest ever, but a peak period version would make for a very tough assignment for virtually any great. You're kidding youself if you think otherwise IMO. I think he'd beat some of 'em.
     
  14. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    Agreed. That's how I see it. But he's not one of the elite top drawer HWs no matter how you try to splice it.
     
  15. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006

    If you count the 'top drawer heavyweights' to be 'top 10' then he's there in my view. I've him at #8 infact and think that's fair. Obviously he's a bit below the likes of Holmes, Lewis, Liston even further behind the consensus 'top 2'.