Could anybody in history outbrawl these fighters?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by CarreraGT, May 20, 2008.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005

    Jake was that strong. I mean that strong....some people believe no 160lber ever can match tigers' strength. There is one........Jake Lamotta. Lamotta also had the durability endless stamina and windmill punching abilities to outbrawl tiger.
     
  2. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,013
    3,462
    Dec 18, 2004
    I think Qawi has a half-decent chance of outbrawling Foster actually. Hi style and chin would hold up. Hagler has little chance of going toe-to-toe with Tiger- and winning, although he'd box from mid-range and secure a decision. Greb is most likely at 160 vs Tiger. Maybe Fullmer?Foreman would mash Tyson, of course. Foreman actually looks like he's letting Lyle hit him clean in that fight, just to prove a point.
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    I think you are not only underating lamottas strength but his durability as well. No one ever came close to stopping a prime in shape jake lamotta. What makes you think tiger was stronger?

    Dempsey has no shot to outbrawl foreman..see firpo fight. Too aggresive, if you are too agressive brawling vs foreman you will get knocked out. to outbrawl foreman, you have to have an brawler with inhumane strength and durability BUT thats less agressive and more mechanical and tactical.....like marciano who foreman will find ackward hitting. Marciano unlike dempsey doesnt rush right in, he mechanically moves slowly shuffling under his high gaurd and low crouch....like I said I pick foreman to stop marciano but out of all the swarmers marciano has the best style to beat a slugger like foreman.


     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,945
    45,820
    Mar 21, 2007
    Some of the **** that Tiger did. Flinging Giardello about. Out-muscling Carter, who successfully sparred inside with Liston. Interestingly, they are around the same height so leverage wouldn't be that big an issue.

    Tiger was totally unmatched in strength until, weirdly, Griffith found a way to test him. And he fought some hugely strong men, none of them could even compete with him. These guys, who thrived upon inside fighting had to box him to have a chance, they ran from him. Did LaMotta dominate such strong men so compeltely? Is it not said that Marshall outmuscled him?



    Dempsey totally dominated the Firpo fight until he got hit on the button. Then he came back and continued to dominate it, showed a great chin. You are right to say that Jack is aggressive, but the peak version (Willard, for example) was careful about picking his spot and offered up wonderful head movement. Foreman is neither particularly quick nor accurate.
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    To outbrawl foreman you have to be mechanical and calculated when you come in.......which was marciano. Dempsey had wonderful head movement but when he faced big sluggers he loved to charge right in like a tiger only the big elephant george foreman would crush the tiger. I just think marciano matches up better vs foreman than dempsey does. Its styles.
     
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005

    Marshall did not outmuscle him, he outfought and outboxed lamotta. Marshall would beat tiger and griffith too. Jake outmuscled Marcel Cerdan very badly, it was jakes strength that caused cerdan to get hurt in the first place.
     
  7. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,297
    1,795
    Nov 11, 2006
    Toney could probably out brawl a good amount of people.. I mean, he could be in a exchange and come out without getting hit... Was good at using his forearms to push peoples around too.
     
  8. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    88
    Dec 26, 2007
    Ones mentioned in this thread that I disagree with.

    Pacquiao(excellent when coming forward, but when backed up, especially by a guy who would nullify Pac's speed with his strength and power, he would get outdone)

    Foster- Fantastic puncher, but it was in close quarters that he was unable to let off his punches due to space(though his left hook was actually still quite efficient in close) and could get manhandled.

    LaMotta- No way he outbrawls Tiger, and I could see a few others hanging with him.

    Rafa Marquez- I think he's proven himself to be a good brawler, but he clearly holds the boxing edge.

    Chavez- Only because Duran was there

    Hagler- Because it is quite obvious that he would've resorted to other tactics against many MW's, and for good reason
     
  9. Mob

    Mob Active Member Full Member

    554
    0
    Jul 23, 2004
    You know about as much about boxing as you do about everything else.

    A prime Foreman would have KILLED a prime Tyson.

    A prime Louis may have beaten a prime Foreman though.
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    why not? Equal Strength, except lamotta had better stamina and durability and higher punchrate.
     
  11. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    88
    Dec 26, 2007
    It's as McGrain said, I simply don't agree that he had equal strength, I don't think Jake would hurt him, and I'd love to see how Jake responded to Tiger's relentlessness when it came down to trading shots. Tiger just seemed to be the stop sign, he was the guy you couldn't back up or stay in there with. For Christ's sake he made Gene Fullmer resort to boxing and moving and beat Hurricane Carter around the ring.
     
  12. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Why Marciano? Sure, he was a great brawler himself but I don't think he would stand a chance fight against a guy who was equally at home in that type of fight, but is so much bigger. Marciano would lose just like Frazier would, in my opinon.

    I fancy two guys to put up a great fight against Foreman. One being Viatli Klitschko and the other Riddick Bowe. Whether they would win, I don't know, but they stand a much better chance.

    I'm only thinking of guys who would try and fight him like this, by the way. Louis wouldn't because he'd get the **** smacked out of him. I doubt Tyson would choose this fight, too. Liston wouldn't either.
     
  13. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,642
    3,451
    Jul 10, 2005
    Lamotta has a good shot in beating Tiger imo.
    Iron Chin, great strength, see the Cerdan fight, He also out work the great Ray Robinson, who was STRONG.
    No one hardly brings up Lamotta's strenght, a shame most of the film we have of Lamotta is past his best, but we are talking PRIME version. I sure people could see Tyson getting out work pretty easy if all we had was footage of the Lewis fight.
     
  14. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,013
    3,462
    Dec 18, 2004
    Strength: Foreman
    Heart: Foreman
    Ability to rise from canvas and win: Foreman.
    Ability to shake off being headbutted without whining to ref: Foreman
    Least amount of cocks' smoked: Foreman


    Foreman KO Tyson. Cus knows best.
     
  15. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    88
    Dec 26, 2007
    :rofl

    But honestly, how the hell do people give Louis a chance at beating Foreman but not Tyson?