I think i might agree with you. How do you think Terrell Ali and Frazier I Ali's chances differ v the Rock?
I think Marciano would have been very hard pressed just getting past Holmes jab. I have Holmes winning this one clearly.
I heard that he was outboxed but benefitted from generous scoring. But I defintely think he could be outboxed. Ali would do. Holmes would do it. And although they are better known as big punchers, I see Liston and Louis outboxing him.
I don't think there's anything to be gained by disputing that Charles put in better performances. However, it's unlikely that anyone will dispute that Charles was one of the best boxers that ever lived. That's a fine win over an active ATG who was certainly in worse long term shape at the end of the fight than the begining.
As for Ali Fraizer 1, I belive Marciano has the same shot as Fraizer did. It will be brutal, I think Ali hit harder and had more power in the 70's, because he sat on his shots when Fraizer was comeing in. Marciano would be there banging away though, Head and body of couse. I think Marciano could swarm himself to a victory similer to what Fraizer did, Fraizer had a bit more speed, but I belive Marciano's arkward stance, and angels(Fraizer lack thsos) could confuse Ali for the power to take its toll on Ali. Not sure on the Ali from the 60's. Terrell was not relly in the class of Ali, Fraizer, or even Marciano. And its always easy to impress vs lower levels of fighters(Ask Roy Jones Jr) I think if George Chovlo could pin Ali on the ropes and give Ali a body beating(Even though Ali may seem like "God", he was peeing blood after the fight) I like Rocky's chances because he has more power than George. Though Ali would be faster. He was still phone of getting caught on the ropes like Cooper and George has shown.
I'd pick Ali 60's to beat Marciano as clean as any man could. But 70's Ali would have to cut Rocky to be sure of victory I think.
Charles was robbed Vs Johnson. While Walcott was still champion. I belive Marciano would do well vs the Walcott from the Louis fights. Marciano did drag Walcott into a war with both fighters hurt. Dont belive the books in Walcott out pointed Marciano for 13 rounds, before Marciano landed. It was just back and fort action. When Walcott pulling ahead in the rounds that Marciano was blind. Than Marciano takeing over the fight in the 10th round, before Walcott regain the motion in the 11th round when he hurt the Rock with a body shot.
Question away. I would not pretend to have all the answers, and I love a good discussion. He was hurt against Choynski in his prime, if I recall correctly...certainly had problems with him. KO'd by Fitz and brutalized by Sharkey of course, while both were slightly past their best (these still deserve to be taken into account, I think...just not as definitive). Against Sullivan, he opposed a fighter who had very little stamina to spare, and when he blitzed Mitchell he did it early*. Kilrain was only a 6 round fight. I will admit that the Jackson fight is a very good one to bring up, though. I'd say that even with the stamina of the Jackson fight, he was still fighting at a comparatively low pace when you look at Marciano. Nobody has that sort of demonic energy, especially if they're about the same size as the Rock, aren't a hard puncher, don't have an exceptional chin, don't prefer inside fighting anyway, and have a style that would tend to get them tied up. * Interesting sidenote: Corbett used strongman Louis Attila for his expertise in weightlifting as a "personal trainer" for the Mitchell fight. He claimed that the training had given him a stiffer punch than usual, and judging from Mitchell getting flattened I'd have to agree.
I not sure Ali could do it, George a fighter with Marciano's similer style gave Ali a good scrap. I just belive Marciano would do better is all.
Perhaps a guy with a style like Terrell or Lewis (sans power) may be able to pull it off. Boring, tall, jabbing fighter who can tie Rocky up on the inside. He'd need a great chin and stamina, however.
Very much so! But this was his introduction to the big time. It would certainly be an exaggeration to call him green but it was a step up in class. I think I'm right in saying that Corbett maintained this was his hardest fight even after Sullivan...don't know what happened after that as most of my stuff comes from the Pollack book. I like this fight for Corbett, though I'd agree with your observation. What I like about it is how he describes seeing Sullivan try to lower his arms, for a short rest, and that was always when he elected to push the action, when he'd seen a sign of Sullivan's tiredness. It is easier to beat a great fighter when they are short of stamina but I was impressed by how he organised things so perfectly in terms of pressure. I feel that if Corbett is fighting, many inangibles may favour him - you must add 5% in terms of his chances unless he is in with a very smart general (as opposed to a capable one, which Rocky certainly was). Yes; dissapionting that he even made these fights. It's an intersting one; how does 25 rounds of hard fighting (plus 20 less hard) circa 1891 translate into stamina and energy in a VERY hard fight circa Rocky's era? You're the man to ask, what do you think? You mean Rocky may manhandle Corbett with ease? I personally am not convinced. But it is possible. No powder puff either by the sound of it. As you have indicated, the Kilrain an Mitchell fights were short...those boys may have been passed their best but they certianly needed to be put away. Nor was it made of glass...I don't think he was there for the taking, put it that way...I'd see him getting dropped by Rocky's bigger shots, the defensive work would be crucial. He may not have preferred it, but he could do it and as i've said, I like this habit he had of scoring on the way into a clinch. I hadn't hear that, thank you.