Could Bernard beat Mikkel Kessler? Calzaghe doesn't think he could...

Now? Mikkel Kessler
Primes? Bernard Hopkins

 

Calzaghe is great -- but untested ... you can't take anything away from the 22 title defenses ... you can't take anything away from his undefeated record...

It is hard to remain undefeated and continue fighting ... fighters will give it all they got just to be the one to give him his first loss.

Look at Frankie Randle against JCC -- no one thought he could do it

Look at Antonio Tarver against RJJ -- no one thought he could do it.

Look at Hopkins v Tito ... alot thought that Hopkins was cashed

Look at Nate Campbell v Juan Diaz ...

Ross Purity v Wlad Klitschko

Oliver McCall v Lennox Lewis ....

Douglass v Tyson

man the list goes on and on and on ...

we'll just have to see in april

 

This is dumb. Of course Joe would say that. Kessler is the best fighter that Joe has faced, of course he would say that Hopkins cant beat him.

Hopkins would bust Kessler a$$, talk about someone being overrated. You have guys saying that Hopkins is overrated then saying that Kessler who has a resume fill of punching bags and former featherweights great. The knowledge on this site is on the decline and fast.

First its the Pac is better then Leonard and now this:-(

 

Kessler's been beat ... the blueprint is already out there ... Hopkins would frustrate him to the point where he folded and quit his game plan.

 

edit

 

kessler now but a younger b0hop beats him

 

well what else can you base things on ? hopkins has fought the best and has beat the best. what has kessler done

 

Of course Calzaghe would say that. atsch He just beat Kessler. Why discredit his own win.