Debatable. Anyway, ATG lists are not all about resume they're about a lot of factors and Calzaghe should rank above him in my opinion.
As another poser has mentioned already you can only say you have a great resume if you beaten the great fighters, other contenders and is stacked with wins. It should be judged on who they beat not who they fought and maybe lost to.
There's no one left for him to fight, no really big money. Hopkins in Cardiff could still happen but that won't move him up. Like with hopkins I could see him beating a shitty heavyweight to be honest. Not the Klitschkos though.
Of course he could. He has already beaten a prime Hopkins, Jones, Trinidad (at 160) destroyed Lacy, Benn, Eubank, Mclellan, Kessler, Tarver, Toney and Taylor he makes the top 10 atg no problems. ENZO, ENZO GET THE ****ING DELOREAN READY AND PICK UP EMMETT BROWN WERE GOING BACK TO 1994!
A little punctuation wouldn't hurt your post. (Just so we could tell WTF you're trying to say.) I'm guessing you meant: How is he better than Tito ? Who has he beaten? WHO??? To answer, your question: Bernard Hopkins. (I would not rank him with Roy though).
Sup dude. Are you being sarcastic or you honestly believe the above? If it is the latter, it's all good.