Could Calzaghe go for 50-0 by fighting HOPKINS, DAWSON, WRIGHT and KESSLER??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Nov 11, 2008.


  1. sebcfc

    sebcfc Member Full Member

    466
    2
    May 22, 2008
    If he was to go for 50-0 I think the line up would be more like this

    Dawson
    Johnson
    Froch
    Plus one more

    Take away Kessler, Winky and B Hop thats not going to happen, first of all because he does not do rematch's while Winky is too small for LHW, look at his fight with B Hop to see what I mean. While with the other three, I can see him having some interest. Dawson because the yanks are again making someone out to be something they are not. Johnson, because everyone says that he is scared of him. While Froch has been saying **** for years about Joe, and I think he would love to school him if he only needed to add a few more fighters. While the last fighter would be someone that is on the fringes at the moment, Taylor maybe?

    Anyways at this point I want to make it clear, that in my mind Joe will retire or give it one more fight. Thats it. I don't think he cares about the 50-0, he is not as in love with boxing as most fighters.
     
  2. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    Not that I want Calzaghe to fight Hopkins, but why does everybody put so much stock in what Joe says he will or won't do? He said that he would not fight Jones in the first place and that Hopkins is not worth his time. I don't think there are many occasions where what is coming out of his mouth aligns with what is going on in his head.
     
  3. crespo21

    crespo21 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,986
    0
    Mar 26, 2008
    whats the point. he would still get slagged. dawson over rated. winky to small. already beat the other 2. etc etc etc.
     
  4. olyalex

    olyalex Manos de piedra Full Member

    1,387
    0
    Jul 11, 2008
    I think he can get to 50-0 but he will never fight Winky or rematch Kessler. I would like Joe to fight Dawson, rematch Hopkins and because i am romanian Bute :)
     
  5. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Stupid comment. As per.
     
  6. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    it is true to a dgree though isn't it if he beat all those guys people would be saying he ducked dirrell or someone like that.
     
  7. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    Oh STFU with this sulky bull****. The idiot minority aside, he gets his credit for wins over Lacy, Kessler and Hopkins. Him not being considered the 2008 white version of Ray Robinson does not equate to him not getting credit. God I'm tired of this.
     
  8. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    It isn't true and they definitely would not say that.
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    My sentiments exactly. It's such a tired, childish, ****ing idiotic attitude.
     
  10. crespo21

    crespo21 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,986
    0
    Mar 26, 2008

    im not pigeon holeing everybody. but you only have to look on the forum to see how many calzaghe sucks **** etc threads there are.
     
  11. crespo21

    crespo21 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,986
    0
    Mar 26, 2008
    thats fine coming from you.:rofl
     
  12. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    There's also a substantial amount of threads and posts clinging to Joe's balls. They only matter when we stoop to their level:good
     
  13. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Regardless of your opinion of me, you are portraying yourself as a petty little child with that stupid attitude. Of course beating 4 more quality fighters and achieving a perfect 50-0 would answer the critics. He has not done that yet, he has a weak resume, if he improved that to the point where he had beaten Rocky Marciano's record and fought another 4 quality fighters, of course he would get MASSIVE credit. Don't be ridiculous.
     
  14. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,244
    2,176
    Jun 24, 2007
    He should fight Dawson,a tomato,Tarver,Then Winky
     
  15. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    I think Glen Johnson is more worth while than Tarver..both are at similar stage but him and Joe have history and Glen put up a much better show against Dawson, than Tarver, I also think itd be more entertaining to watch.