**Could Cotto vs. PBF has the same fate as Pryor vs. SRL....**

what he fails to mention, is that before fighting brusseles, he was already vivian harris' mandatoryso he did not have to fight bruselles in order to get a title shot.

 

I dont know. I just know Zoo called out Gatti after a fight and wanted a PPV showdown. Zoo's contract might of been coming up for Showtime. I dont know the whole. I do know Floyd wanted Zoo, and the winners were suppose to fight.

 

Lets go after Harris title. While Zoo is calling for Gattis title. And **** the showdown between Gatti-Floyd winner vs Zoo-Hatton winner.



BTW How could Floyd become the 1 Mando for WBA belt, when he was holding the WBC at 135 and moved up and only fought in two WBC Eliminators?:huh


Beating Corley makes you a mando of a title?

 

nowhere does he say thag he GUESSES the contract is void. he said that the contract is void. the contract was signed for the undisputed ww championship. since he was no longer champion, the terms of that contract could not be fulfilled, because zab no longer had the titles in his possession. therefore rendering the contract void. how in the hell can you fight or something you don't have.

 

in hte time he fought brusseles, then gatti, could have ben just as easily haris and gatti, andguess wat, he would have hld two thirds of the belts as leverage for the tszyu fight.

 

First, it never says it went void for that reason. He was assuming it went void because he lost.


2nd, Zab only lost the WBC title, he kept the WBA and IBF, then the WBA stripped him.


The contract was signed, and he assumed it was void thats why he said the fight will probably never happen.

 

You realize that he had to go through two eliminators to get to Gattis belt to try to take it and fight the winner of Zoo-Hatton? Right?

 

you have the article right in front of you. find the word assume. it is not there. let me guess you know what he meant.
and if you knew anything about boxing, with the exception of the bul**** that the ibf pulled, any champion who has lost a title fight at the stipulated weight even if only one title is at stake, the titles have been vacated. so when you hear that a unified champion is only d3efending one belt, that inly means that the chalenger only can win that belt.it does.n't mean that if the champion loses he gets to keep the others. so when the statement was made that the contract was void, it was because of the past history of boxing, knowing full well that zab would be stripped of the other titles.

 

Wanna know how I know you are stupid. You think Floyd opted to fight Mandos instead of fight Gatti. :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

I thought we talked about this, you had to finish hooked on phonics before you posted again.

atsch

 

You dont know what was in the contract. There was never a resigning of the contract. They just went through with it. Floyd took his IBF then fought Baldomir. Even if the contract was voided(it wasen't) Floyd had personal reasons to fight Zab.

 

if zab did not make 3.5, it was not the same contract. and zab did not make 3.5

 

atsch