**Could Cotto vs. PBF has the same fate as Pryor vs. SRL....**

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Orishaman, Jan 17, 2008.


  1. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Im not saying Zoo ducked him. Zoo didn't look at him. Simple as that. Zoo was looking at Gatti and unifying.


    Floyd went after Gattis title. Brussles was a WBC Elim. And Mitchell was a warm up fight at 147.
     
  2. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    What? You said he would win, then you changed your mind and said he lose.

    Obviously you predicted wrong. Dumbass.
     
  3. AlonzoGreene

    AlonzoGreene Active Member Full Member

    592
    0
    Dec 8, 2007
    Don't get mad cuz he just played you. That just show how much of a tool you are and how worthless your opinions are.

    LMFAO

    You said Floyd would win first. Then you let your hate of him cloud your judgement, and then predicted Hatton to punish him. This obviously shows that you hate Floyd so much that you would say any ****ing thing. How can I take anything you say seriously.

    You're a hater. Admit. I mean damn get the **** over yourself. Did Floyd KO your ass in amateurs and your bitter about it? I don't get it.

    You people are impossible. One minute "insert fighter here" is going to knock Fraud Gayweather out. Then the next minute, you guys say that Floyd keeps taking handpicked fights by challenging "insert same fighter here", instead of fighting "insert new flavor of the month here". Y'all don't realize how dumb as **** y'all sound.

    I give some of y'all props though. I can tell that some of you know a little something about boxing and probably used to box, because its apparent some of you all took too many shots to the head.
     
  4. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    Fraud should have been going after KT instead of Gatti - cause Fraud is always about the linear title right??? Or is that only when the linear title is held by a journeyman. :lol:

    Fraud didnt need to fight Bruseles, Gatti would have fought him anyway. It was an easy payday for the coward - thats why she took it.
     
  5. AlonzoGreene

    AlonzoGreene Active Member Full Member

    592
    0
    Dec 8, 2007
    We know how this continous story goes.

    If Floyd would have fought KT, he would have won. No doubt about that one. Then everybody would have said that win wouldn't really count because Zoo was shot or over-the-hill like DLH. It's an endless story.

    What makes you even think they 38 year old KT who couldn't do nothing with Hatton at 140, could beat Mayweater at 140. If Floyd can go up to 154 and beat a much bigger and inactive DLH, what makes you think he wouldn't have an easier time with someone who was even older, smaller, and more inactive?

    And the main point is: HATTON STOPPED ZOO!!!!!!! MAYWEATHER CRUSHED HATTON!!!!!! What is there to debate. Mayweather EASILY beats the over-the-hill Zoo. It's not even close. "Floyd should've fought Zoo instead of Gatti"...umm Zoo should've challenged Floyd instead of Gatti. Zoo was the champion....well at least until he got stopped lol.

    You guys, like always, have no argument here. Even the Magarito **** has more credibility than this bull****.
     
  6. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004


    I give up, your just purposely trying to stir up ****. :verysad
     
  7. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    Yeah cause Bruseles and Gatti were clearly bigger threats than KT. :nut

    I would have no problem if Fraud fought Hatton at 140. . . but the scumbag saw Hatton struggle with Collazo at 147 and saw Chane school Collazo at 147 and said "Yup, Hatton is my path of least resistance at 147"


    Fraud did duck Margarito more clealry than KT, Ill give you that.