I got a better job. Making twice what I was and have almost paid off my student loans. I'm about to start flexing.
Statement. The guy said Tito was cutting 15 pounds to make 147. Which he implied makes Tito not a natural Welterweight. I then said cutting 15 pounds is typical to make weight today.
He was cutting more than 15 pounds to make 147. His natural weight was 154-60 pounds. And GGG would not have been criticized for Beating Tito at 160 like you think.
Cmon...you guys talked about the same subjects and said the same things. now that you resurfaced the scarecrow alt is MIA.
Hops resume is still light years ahead of 3G's! Regardless of how overrated you may say it is! Hagler is a once in a life time fighter! Not too many guys get to grace the ring with a fighter of his caliber! That's why it drives me crazy when 3G fans come on here and make ridiculous statements about how 3G, not only beats Hagler but, brutalizes him! Look at Hagler and his career and look at 3G's resume, no way can anyone, from G's opponents, come to an honest conclusion that G beats Hagler! Of course I am talking on resume alone! A fight between Hagler and 3G would be unbelievable!
Would not be criticized? His opponents are normally heavier than him, but he still gets criticism. Fighters that walk as heavy as 165-170 are too small for him - Cotto, Rosado, Andrade, Charlo brothers, Lara,.. Canelo is "too small" even if he walks 180.. Golovkin would be criticized no matter what.
Are we not talking about World renowned, one of the Greatest boxers to ever lace up a pair of Gloves Felix "Tito" Trinidad? You GGG fans are hella paranoid.:deal