could Joe calzaghe have beaten a prime james toney

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by IRONSENSE2002, Jan 24, 2011.


  1. IRONSENSE2002

    IRONSENSE2002 muslim and proud Full Member

    5,383
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    james toney was an extremely inconsistent fighter but when he had his **** together he was pretty bad ass to watch, his upper body movement,shoulder roll and counter punching is some of the best iv seen, calzaghe was a high volume combo puncher with great footwork,i think calzaghe could be wild at times and leave himself open to counters he'd stand square in front of an opponent regularly, however as roy jones showed toney could be disrupted by speed and calzaghe had plenty of it.
    so who wins H2H
    calzaghe of the lacy fight vs toney from the iran barkley fight
     
  2. Nipple

    Nipple I hate my username banned

    5,332
    5
    Sep 6, 2010
    Wasn't Toney's prime @ 160?

    Toney is a seriously awesome boxer.

    Tough to call.

    I say Toney.
     
  3. Joan_Guzman

    Joan_Guzman Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,244
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    No just no. Toney would pot shot him to pieces.
     
  4. boxingscorecard

    boxingscorecard Active Member Full Member

    662
    2
    Jan 18, 2011
    no chance in hell , toney was on a different level to calzaghe

    hopkins outpoints joe prime for prime

    jones jnr doesnt lose a round prime for prime

    joe should have tested himself more in a career that promised much but ended up a long wbo reign with sub class challengers.

    joes best win is kessler - kessler is a good fighter but nowhere near great
     
  5. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Yes, absolutely.

    Toney's record is probably more padded than Calzaghe's..... after the bad defeat to Jones he only ever beat about three more decent fighters, and was clearly outpointed twice by Montell Griffin - who was very average.

    Calzaghe would need to be at his best, but I'd say that assuming he is, it's a 50-50 fight.
     
  6. boxingcrazy

    boxingcrazy Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,239
    52
    Jul 3, 2010
    i think toney would have been too smart for calzaghe. ud toney
     
  7. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Yes Calzaghe would be a slight favourite for me. Toney way, waaay more good to watch though.
     
  8. Lee Mc

    Lee Mc Boxing Addict banned

    7,107
    3
    Jan 12, 2009
    It would have been interesting but, as Beeston says, Toney's record is very padded out.
     
  9. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    There's a lot of quality on his record, especially pre-Jones; Nunn, Barkley, Johnson, McCallum, Jirov. He's hung around for a lot time fighting cans, and was very inconsistent, but that shouldn't take away from the fighter he was.

    I think Toney beats Calzaghe. It would have been a tough nights work for Toney, but Calzaghe would be eating big counters and missing most of his shots.
     
  10. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Calzaghe wins this. Two things Toney didn’t like – movers and guys with fast hands. He’s fairly plodding on his feet and prefers to stand with his opponents. Calzaghe may oblige him at times, but more often he’d be stepping around Toney and firing off quick flurries.

    Toney might block a lot of them, but some would get through. He would also have his moments, particularly with his excellent counter-right. He might score a KD early in the fight, ala Hopkins. Even under pressure Toney stays very composed – so he’d see opportunities to fire between Joe’s bursts.

    Unfortunately for Toney, his major game was always coming on strong in the late rounds. And Calzaghe doesn’t fade – he keeps the volume up. Toney doesn’t have the footwork of Hopkins to put Joe out of position, so he can’t break his rhythm that way. And he can’t wear him down since Joe is so sturdy.

    Toney’s a very slick fighter, but I think he gets very overrated. He has some good wins, particularly at 160/68, but after that his record is very spotty. He has some poor losses when he was in his physical prime which can’t just be dismissed.

    Joe, I think has the speed, skill, stamina and adaptability to keep Toney out of any rhythm. Calzaghe takes it something like 7-5 or 8-4, surviving a few rocky moments on the way as Toney steps his offence up.
     
  11. riggers

    riggers Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,218
    3
    Aug 14, 2008
    Prime Toney, was an excellent , fast boxer. Look at the performance against Prince Charles Williams, or Barkley. His combinations were superb. On those nights he beats Joe, stops him probably. But on his poorer nights , like Tiberi, he was awful. If they fought five times Joe would win some. It depends much more on which Toney shows up than which Joe shows up.
     
  12. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Toney had fast hands and threw combinations beautifully, but he didn’t work consistently and he was always somewhat stationary. That plays into Calzaghe’s hands. But this would definitely be a competitive fight.
     
  13. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Yes. Calzaghe would have been clipped and made to miss but Joe was relentless. If Toney shut up shop, he would be outworked. If he went with smoking Joe, he'd be running on fumes by the end. A prime prime Toney like the one that went all out with Barkley could make it a bloody war.

    The difference - Joe could adapt.
     
  14. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    Ah, Calzaghe being able to adapt has been mentioned.

    Now we need a "Joe didn't know how to lose" to really get this thing going
     
  15. Evil Rick

    Evil Rick Active Member Full Member

    574
    0
    Jun 14, 2010
    It's a tough one to call, as dftaylor mentioned Toney wasn't that great with his feet or at the least I would give a big advantage to Joe in this department. In timing and skill I give a huge advantage to Toney however the work rate and stamina would clearly be in the favour of Calzaghe, I also think the weight would be an issue. To me a prime Toney was at 160 and I think he wouldn't have the power to keep Joe off him long enough to get the slick boxing going effectively.

    In short I don't know but I slightly edge towards Joe but I am probably bias to the British fighter. ;)