Could Pac defend his lineal title vs the winner of Valero vs Peterson @ 140?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, Feb 22, 2010.


  1. JLocs

    JLocs Guest

    whats up JOKER CALLED YOU A TATTLE TALE AKA SN..........but i told him you were raised that way its not your FAULT:smoke
     
  2. JLocs

    JLocs Guest

    like i said who cares what that CHEAT DOES HEREIN THE STATES
     
  3. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    You tried this **** last time. Tattle tale? SN? WTF you talking about child.
     
  4. JLocs

    JLocs Guest

    WHAT were you suggesting then:lol:
     
  5. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    I really tire of kids playing dumb here. :patsch

    WTF is the AKA SN **** you were talking about?


    Hey Jlocs...quit being a coward and answer.
     
  6. allenray

    allenray Active Member Full Member

    680
    0
    Dec 23, 2009
    don't post if you don't care... otherwise, you're just showing your jealousy like the pathetic floyd who talks more about pac than mosley in all his interviews :D. i hope the old guy gives him a lucky punch to keep his big mouth quiet :rofl
     
  7. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    hmm says . . .

    the thread is turning into **** and not into a serious discussion.. gd trolling...

    on topic.. i can see some potential with your views philla. I'm sure people would buy into a valero pac fight but other posters do bring up some good arguments... I'm still thinking there is a much greater chance of Pac PBF happening next if both win their fights. If negotiations go to **** again, I'm sure Valero, Bradley, or Peterson might be good viable options but going back down to 140 might heed criticism.. I don't mind Pac going back down in weight as long as the fights are meaningful..
     
  8. Kid Cuba

    Kid Cuba Boxing Junkie banned

    7,712
    0
    Feb 16, 2009
    Honestly I would rather see this then Pacquiao/Clottey.

    Or at least Pacquiao/Bradley.
     
  9. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Who are 'they' and how do 'they' strip someone of a lineal title?
     
  10. Kid Cuba

    Kid Cuba Boxing Junkie banned

    7,712
    0
    Feb 16, 2009
    Only the IBO title, he still has his Ring Championship.
     
  11. YelloLabs

    YelloLabs Shura No Toki Full Member

    444
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    If he does lose the election, I'd rather see Bradley/Pacman as Arum suggested last month . . . don't think we'll see Floyd this year . .
     
  12. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,282
    5,905
    Oct 5, 2009
    Rather see him vs Urango
     
  13. BOGART

    BOGART Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,903
    259
    Jul 19, 2004
    If Valero beats Peterson, which I don't think he will and I'm not sure how definite that fight actually is, then I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see Pacquaio-Valero. Valero is liscensed in Texas and Arum and Jerry Jones seem to be fine with doing business together so maybe another Pacquaio fight at Texas Stadium. Arum promotes both guys and he loves to stay in house with his guys and Pacquaio wanted to keep his Ring 140 pound championship for a reason. So there are signs that this fight could be on Arum's list.

    If Valero can get by Peterson then I wouldn't mind a Pacquaio-Valero fight. Pacquaio would be a solid favorite but it would be fun while it lasted. But make no mistake the one fight that needs to be made is Pacquaio-Mayweather/Mosley winner. I would expect a fight with Mosley to be very likely if he wins but I don't think Pacquaio wants Mayweather at all.
     
  14. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Why would Valero fight Peterson at 140 when he can fight Bradley, and why would Peterson take on such a tough challenge after losing to Bradley??? This doesn't make sense for either guy...