Could Prime Wlad beat Prime Mike Tyson with his clinching tactics?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by baconmaker, Dec 30, 2016.


  1. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,249
    23,939
    Jul 21, 2012
    You didn't watch anything. You're running off recycled garbage posted by Tyson haters. Everything you said about Biggs in this thread was said by On The Money in his stupid troll thread. It was almost a word for word copy n paste job.
    You stole the 'highlight reel' quote off ME. I say that about Kturds like you. You're using my material and you don't even know it. I bet you never watched an early Tyson fight in full in your whole life.
    Its obvious by the drivel you post.

    No. Absolute horse dung. You're commenting on fights you never watched. Why? The only guys who had problems in those fights were BIGGS and THOMAS.
    Biggs got countered with head snapping counters with every jab he landed. The blood was pouring out his mouth after the first round. He took a battering in every round after that.
    Thomas was beaten from pillar to post. He took more damage in the first round than Wlad took in ALL 5 rounds against Brewster. Half of that first Thomas round is more then enough to lay WK flat out on his back.
    And Biggs and Thomas were better movers than Wlad. WK can't take more than two steps back before he has to hold on. These guys could circle and jab around the ring all 3 mins of ever round.


    So in other words - in a fair fight , under the rules of boxing Wlads chances plummet? Yeah no chit sherlock. You know as well as i do WK is nothing without his illegal huggy bear tactics. Under K2 house rules and a personal ref was his mode of success against C and D rate Heavyweights. Take that away from him and he can't even impress against a novice like Jennings.
    Against Mike its over in under two minutes.
     
    IKSAB likes this.
  2. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,728
    81,032
    Aug 21, 2012
    :eaea: DinoDeluded is off his crazy pills again

    :hollering: DinoDunce fails yet again at his mindreading trick

    :Saeufer: Cool. Yet another person that agrees with me. DinoLoser doesn't seem to realise that he's drilling holes into his boat, right here.

    :rolleye: DinoNutter needs to put up or STFU

    :buenrollo: Oh, boy. So DinoInsane thinks that he invented the highlight reel? Moving right along ...

    Well there's another bet that you just lost. Then again, you'd just welch on it like you do every other time.

    He did very well in the first round, and that's what I based my comment on.

    And yet again, that's what I already said. Geez, use your own material, would you? DinoNutbag evidently missed the rest of my comments on how Thomas effectively jab n grabbed Tyson for almost five rounds after that.

    I believe so. Tyson is wrong for Klitschko given his average chin and the fact that he doesn't like getting hit. Then again, the younger version of Wlad was a marvellous offensive boxer who would give even a prime Tyson something to think about. Frankly though, I think Tyson's chin gives him the edge in a free for all, especially at close range. See, I'm not scared of a realistic evaluation of a matchup.

    :treadmill: DinoHater keeps that hate train rolling :buenrollo: "Nothing", eh? Wlad had a great career before Steward turned him into Dr Octopus (and, incidentally, one of the most dominant fighters in the history of boxing) ... but a further note is that his tactics are not unique to him nor particularly illegal. Ali did it, Ruiz did it, Hopkins did it, and many others. Where you and I do find common ground is that we wish that the referees would crack down on excessive hugging because it makes for a pyss poor show. But the jab n grab is effective, worse luck.
     
  3. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,143
    Apr 4, 2012
    DinoDunce wants to be one of Mike's pigeons so he can be hand fed and petted while he coos about how great he is.