Could Roland Lastarza have succeeded in other eras?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Oct 8, 2007.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,942
    24,877
    Jan 3, 2007
    Roland Lastarza was a pretty decent fighter in my eyes. At one point, he was rated as the best defensive heavyweight of all time, and better than average boxing ability as well. He may very well have been one of the toughest challenges that a youthful Marciano ever had. Roland's career deteriorated following his second match with the Rock. He sustained an inordinate amount of punishment to both of his arms, resulting in the need for extensive surgery. After this point, he was never quite the same fighter again.

    In my opinion, Roland fought a very defensive style of boxing that was not terribly aggresive and nor did he have much sting to his punches, or so it would appear. This may have been the limiting factor which prevented his rising to champion status.

    Does anyone think that he might have been a champ in a different era, or at least a legitimate title threat in most?
     
  2. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    I doubt he would be a champ in any era but i have no doubts he could be a contender in quite a few. Even in todays weak heavyweight ranks i could see fighter's like wlad and tua being able to hand out too much damage for roland to deal with.
     
  3. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    Fighters have grown so large that after the 1960's or so it is difficult to see LaStarza being very successful at heavy. He might do well at cruiser, though. I think he would have been a contender in earlier eras. He had excellent boxing skills. A champion? Only if he got the right guy, such as Hart or Burns and possibly Braddock or a fading Sharkey, on the right night.
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,942
    24,877
    Jan 3, 2007
    Well,

    Although we've been hitting the whole size thing a bit too much this week, I can't help but notice that Lastarza never broke the 200 pound mark. In addition, he had a hard enough time putting away guys were within the same 180-190 range. I certainly don't think that he'd have much to offer in terms of being able to actually hurt larger heavyweights from later periods, however his stamina and trmendous defensive skills may tend to frustrate a lot of guys, leading to some close decisions and perhaps even a few late stoppages.
     
  5. dalek

    dalek Member Full Member

    120
    3
    Aug 3, 2005
    he'd have a chance today for sure.avoiding wlad,the others really are a mediocre lot.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,523
    27,100
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that he would have been a solid contender in any era but as others have said the championship would always have eluded him unless you can realy cherry pick a weak point in the lineage such as Leon Spinks. He is certainly the type of fighter who could have potentialy exploited a divided title to pick up an alphabet strap.

    He might just have had a shot if Marciano had not been around as there would have been a bit of a vacum between Walcott & Charles being old but servicable and Floyd Patterson coming along.
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,942
    24,877
    Jan 3, 2007
    Now, that would have been an intesting matchup. Only of course, if both men were in their prime. Floyd and Roland were right around the same size. Patterson had a great offensive arsenal, whereas Lastarza's defense was one of the best. I don't know if a 21 year old Patterson had the experience to penetrate the defensive abilities of a prime Lastarza. I also question weather or not he had the power to overcome Roland's stamina and work ethic. That would have been a tough pick.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,661
    28,975
    Jun 2, 2006
    Lastarza was a good boxer ,with a good chin ,but he lacked real power,the second Marciano fight ruined him.
     
  9. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    Roland would have been Cruiser Champ in this day and age.
     
  10. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    I doubt that he wasn't agressive enough and against a huge puncher like haye he would have been in trouble.
     
  11. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006


    :lol:
     
  12. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    I don't know what you find so funny, a defensive fighter is a bad bet against somebody who has serious 1 punch ko power.
     
  13. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006

    Haye didn´t even prove himself against the CW-elite, and now you favour him against a very good HW who had an iron chin? Sorry, that´s just too directly that you´re biased...
     
  14. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    Lastarza handled Marcianos power without being knocked un conscious,handled Rex Layne as well. I think he could handle Hayes Power,out box and out smart as well.
     
  15. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    He hasn't yet proved himself, if he beats mormeck then he will easily have shown he is a top fighter. Also just becuase one guy is a good fighter doesn't mean that a less talented fighter can't beat them, styles make fights. Also how you can accuse anyone of being bias with half the stuff you say is a right cheek.