Could Roland Lastarza have succeeded in other eras?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Oct 8, 2007.


Page 6 of 6
  1. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    To a very close decision--Quarry proved he could outspeed big, very hard hittting, but perhaps plodding fighters such as Shavers, Foster, and Lyle. He certainly has the stronger resume by far. LaStarza, though, I think was faster and more elusive and Quarry tended to have trouble with the slick, fast-stepping boxers such as Machen and Ellis. Basically a toss-up, but if pressed for a choice, I would choose Quarry because of his better resume.
     
    OLD FOGEY, Oct 9, 2007
    OLD FOGEY, Oct 9, 2007
    #76
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,280
    25,655
    Jan 3, 2007
    Probably a good pick. And I agree that this fight would likely be a decision, as neither of these men were tremendous hitters and both were very durable. I think Quarry was the better offensive fighter, while Lastarza had a better defense. I'm not sure if either man would pressure the other enough to make it a very exciting fight, but in any event, it would likely be close.
     
    mr. magoo, Oct 9, 2007
    mr. magoo, Oct 9, 2007
    #77
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,280
    25,655
    Jan 3, 2007
    Well let's think about this for moment.

    Given that the perameters for what defined a " true heavyweight ", were different back in those days, then by definition, they were in fact true heavyweights in their time.
     
    mr. magoo, Oct 9, 2007
    mr. magoo, Oct 9, 2007
    #78
Page 6 of 6