Could someone please define "One-Dimensional" for me?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JETSKI, Jun 13, 2008.


  1. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    Sorry.. facts are facts.
     
  2. billyconn

    billyconn Active Member Full Member

    1,296
    0
    Oct 6, 2007
    __________________________________________
     
  3. mad_takamura

    mad_takamura It's getting hot in here! Full Member

    2,408
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    No! Contra! If you ever remember that old school game.YA-HAA!!!
     
  4. billyconn

    billyconn Active Member Full Member

    1,296
    0
    Oct 6, 2007

    John Smith, a two time Olympic gold medalist American freestyle wrestler and 6x World Champion said that the Soviet Union's coaches mocked that he only had a single leg takedown......Smith said "Try and stop it".......:good
     
  5. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    If that one dimension means you are greater then all the other persons multi dimensions put together. Why does it matter.

    *multi dimensional can also mean, "jack of all trades real master of none.*
     
  6. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Not adjustable. Predictable.
     
  7. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    The Karelin lift > The Smith single leg takedown :good

    If we're gonna make references to wrestling and comparisons, Karelin is to Calzaghe as Pavlik is to Kurt Angle. :D
     
  8. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Pavlik is one-dimensional. He's an A-grade fighter, he's terrific at what he does, but he has not really demonstrated great adaptability that I've seen.

    He comes forward and throws straight punches, and it works very well for him. However, it'll be interesting to see him adapt if he fights someone who can consistently back him up.

    Look at a guy like Lennox. Lennox could be on you like stink on **** (Golota, Grant) or he could sit back and keep you on the end of a jab all night. (Tua) That's adaptability. If his opponent had something he was REALLY good at, Lennox could fight an entirely different style to take that advantage away from him. That, plus his physical attributes, meant that Lewis was NEVER faced with an inferior guy who would beat him most times because of styles. He'd just switch styles to counter it.

    That's multi-dimensional. Pavlik doesn't have that. Nothing against the guy, he hasn't faced anyone who can cope with the style he brings, but just because he has A-grade chin AND heart AND power, doesn't mean he's multi-dimensional. He just uses all of those attributes to good advantage in his one style.

    :hat
     
  9. jlrivera81

    jlrivera81 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,798
    1
    Jun 11, 2007
    calling pavlik one-dimensional is ridiculous. people called cotto one-dimensional also for years.

    one dimensional fighters are ruiz, hatton, margarito (to a lesser extent)