Could Tyson land enough to beat Valuev?

Yes at 37 years of age... Who did Valuev fight at 37? Oh yeah he retired after having his clock cleaned by a 200 year old Holyfield

 

You wasted entirely too much time explaining all that to him.

 

Ha!

I'm just about done here.

If they genuinely think Mike couldn't have beaten Valuev, even though that Ruslan etc could, then what's the point?

Just clueless casuals.

 

If only Douglas had been Chagaev's size?

 

Thread, thread and thread......

 

How is it bull****?

Look, you have to take responsibility for your own actions in life. And If Mike didn't train properly for the fight, then that was on him. If nobody has any sympathy, that's okay by me. But don't try and pretend that Mike was both physically and mentally at 100%, when he wasn't. We're not focusing solely on the weight, we're focusing on his conditioning etc. Greg Page had knocked him down in sparring. He was simply a different fighter to what he'd been previously before King came on the scene. Which you'd know, if you'd followed his career.

What are you talking about, slipping back in and out of his prime? Grow up, and take in what I'm telling you. The Douglas fight was a huge shock, but he'd performed badly in the Bruno fight. He wasn't as sharp, he'd took shots he shouldn't have, and his team were concerned. Again, when King and the money came, and the dedication went, he was a different fighter. I don't believe that James would have beaten the versions of Mike who'd beaten the likes of Berbick and Spinks, when he was 100% focused, fighting to his full capabilities.

Now what does any of this have to do with Valuev FFS?

 

I'm waiting for my tea to cook.

But I have wondered to myself why I even bothered writing about Jacobs and Cayton etc.

As if he knows who they are.

 

I'm wondering to myself why I even responded to this re****ed thread.

 

I seem to have the world's best expert on top of it. :good

 

Valuev was avoided by most elite fighters while he was in his prime.