You keep saying "the end". and then keep coming back for more. In the words of the great Inigo Montoya, I do not think you understand the meaning of this word.
You're all over the place. You and Balder claimed Valuev would be too big. But since that theory has been crushed, you're now going with - Chagaev could fight in a way that Mike couldn't. It's beyond a joke. Mike at his best, was a better fighter than Chagaev, Haye and a 46 year old Holyfield. That's it.
Ruslan was bigger than Tyson and fought in a way Mike couldn't, Mike didn't beat Holyfield Valuev did... Now leave it.
He was hardly any bigger than Mike. atsch They were practically the same size. Ruslan also couldn't fight in the same manner that Mike could. Holyfield beating Mike is of no relevance. An 80's version of Mike would have been much of a threat to Valuev, than a 46 year old Holyfield. Then there's Haye. An 80's version of Mike was better than Haye. Just stop digging a bigger hole for yourself. If Chagaev could beat Valuev, then Mike certainly could have.