Yeah well 2/3 of the trained professionals scoring the fight were generous to AJ. And if its 3 rounds he lost 24 rounds and if 2 rounds hes lost 23. It doesn't change the characterization of this argument. What if we went to the minority opinions from the first Fury fight. Nickle and diming competitive rounds like this eventually cancels itself out, its kinda pointless.
When Uysk was at cruiserweight he was actually throwing a lot more punches and more success being the aggressor and he had a higher KO rate. In many ways facing guys his own size or even smaller in most cases would also benefit him even though sometimes people say the opposite.
The point is to actually watch and judge fights as they are not rely on so called experts to judge fights for us and the treat their word as gospel.
It becomes an issue when they're fighting good opponents fights tend to be more competitive then when they're fighting basic contenders and when they clearly beat those good opponents we give them credit for it, not judge them for how many rounds they won. Like I said only Usyk gets this level of scrutiny for some reason. So you admit you do hold Usyk to a different standard then other fighters. Good to know. To answer why because no other fighter has had to overcome as many disadvantages as Usyk has as many times as he has. Usyk has always been the b side in every fight he has and is able to overcome that and beat the A side usually on their home turf every single time. How many other fighters can say the same especially at heavyweight?
He'd be right there in the mix with all of them. I'm not going to say he'd go undefeated, but he'd win some.
Jimmy Young isn't some H2H monster and to pretend he is because he managed to outbox Ron Lyle and George Foreman of all people is ridiculous. George just struggles with boxers, ergo he'd struggle mightily with a Prime Usyk.