Could Welterweight Duran (Montreal) Give Robinson His Toughest Ft?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Sep 21, 2022.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,584
    May 4, 2017
    I think Robinson was better than Leonard.
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,236
    49,586
    Apr 27, 2005
    Which certainly doesn't necessarily make Duran a tougher challenge (than SRL) for said SRR. The vast majority wouldn't favor either of them.
     
  3. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,594
    29,296
    Jun 26, 2009
    I think Robinson was better than most, probably everyone, but if you’re picking a welterweight to go in and try to beat him who are you going to pick that you think has a better chance than Hearns or Leonard?
     
  4. META5

    META5 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,920
    3,450
    Jun 28, 2005
    SRR was better poised to hurt Duran than SRL in Montreal.

    I have often said that a raging SRR was like a hybrid of SRL and Hearns. He was a more concussive puncher than SRL and carried Hearns' right hand prowess with better stamina, bouncebackability and durability. More importantly, SRR's body work and ability to whip punches around defensive hand positioning, through guards and uppercut, hookercut and hook to body and head mid combination effortlessly between hands stands him in good stead to emphasise his height and reach advantages.

    That Duran was a special, special fighter, but I believe that SRR adapts better than SRL did to Duran's footspeed; that he circles, establishes his jab and explodes in Hearns like fashion with the right hand disguised behind a few jab and hook combos, feints and traps.

    I wouldn't venture Duran getting knocked out as that Hearns thing was a rarity, but if Tommy could do it, I wouldn't put it past SRR to do it.
     
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,584
    May 4, 2017
    Duran would throw more shots than Leonard would and land on the inside more.
     
  6. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,584
    May 4, 2017
    Hearns would have a better chance because of that long jab and powerful right hand.
     
  7. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,584
    May 4, 2017
    He was a master at everything.
     
    Fergy likes this.
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,601
    20,147
    Apr 3, 2012
    Mayweather would probably do better than Duran. Duran's loses mostly came to boxer movers.
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,848
    10,057
    Jul 15, 2008
    Duran was an exceptional fighter but I don't see him beating a prime Ray Robinson at Ray's best weight .. in addition , Robinson was a huge two handed puncher. Duran of Montreal gives Robinson a terrific fight till he doesn't .. that's how I see it ..
     
    Pugguy and mark ant like this.
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,653
    16,584
    May 4, 2017
    Duran would throw and land more than Floyd.
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,236
    49,586
    Apr 27, 2005
    Leonard had faster hands and was better on the outside.