Here are the parts of your opening sentence that are true: "Browne is younger and bigger" - the rest? Not so much.
I feel Brown was arguably a better opponent than Ortiz Brown has the better singular win on his resume and been a world champ
Other bits that are true Brown has a higher KO% Brown has been a world champ Brown has a better singular win Brown has more wins over undefeated opposition
Of course they do. Why would they not mean anything? Very big factors Undefeated records and titles hype fans and its amazing how much so. Brown has a better win than any Ortiz has and that is a big factor
I wouldn't be surprised if Parker's next fight is against Big Daddy. It would be a big fight in Australia or NZ and would be a ppv with a little gold in it for both of them. Parker will not be making the same money he made against AJ until he rebuilds. It would be the biggest hw fight in that region since Jack Johnson won the hw title against Tommy Burns more than 100 years ago. Two recently deposed world champs. Parker was wise to fight AJ when he did and make 10 times his previous high pay day before he was beaten by one of the contenders he has been only scraping home against... Ruiz, Takam and Fury. Kinda reminds me or Charles Martin who basically sold his title to the highest bidder AJ. If Parker had lost to one of them he could have forgotten about a 10 mil + payday.
I'd rather rate today's Browne pretty low Fat, uninterested, slower than today's George Foreman, coming only for paycheck (just like Bermane Stiverne last November)
yeah, but first round ko? You saw how bad Buffet Bermane was vs journeyman Rossi and that was two years before he fell prey to the windmills. Browne offers slightly more than that. Mid rounds methinks.
Browne is just bigger and that's it. Todays Browne and todays Stiverne are just punching bags who will get beaten badly by any top-30 HW.