Coward Dirrell lost for words when asked which doctor told him he couldn't fight.

:rofl:rofl:rofldeal:deal
20/20

 

Dirrell NEVER got hurt, that's what we are saying. Can't you understand it?

 

"This mother****er on to us, I better act a bit spastic"

 

Dirrell now has three questionable blemishes. The disgraceful 'performance' v Froch, the dubious 'KO' by AA, and now this so called brain injury. Maybe one he could get away with, but not three. Not in boxing

 

Bwahaha!:rofl

You = ****.

 

This content is protected

 

If you make sensible points, I'll happily reply. It's when the thread has dissolved into absolutely **** that I don't reply because I know it's inevitable that the argument will carry on going round in circles, like it always does. The reason you're such a bad poster and not worth debating with, is because you'll never admit you're wrong. Never. Even when it's crystal clear that you're talking out of your arse, you'll stick by your argument. The thing is, one of our arguments could end up with me saying "Joe Frazier was better than Tony Galento" and, because you're an argumentative ****, you'll diminish everything Frazier ever did, talk about Galento like he was great - Just because you refuse to back down on any points, even when it's clear you're wrong.

Case in point, the floored thread. Why did you not reply to me quoting a post from you, where you referred to a fighter being knocked down as "floored"? You made this entire big deal about how "flooring" a fighter was not knocking them down, yet you described a knock down as "floored" yourself. So even though you contradicted yourself and it's obviously you were talking out of your arse, you still didn't back down.

That's why I don't bother arguing with you. You're a like a petulant child who is arguing in the school yard, saying "my dad is bigger than your dad". You're a troll and, even though I like exposing your bull****, you're tedious 99% of the time. Probably one of the least respected members on here, a very basic knowledge of styles and the history of boxing, yet, despite that, you'll never admit you're wrong.

I "ran" because you're an idiot Your list was garbage and included 3 foreigners and guys like McClellan and Norris, neither of who were as good as someone like Eubank, Benn or Hamed. It was a poor list but, if I pointed out it's flaws, you'd have gone on some long, tedious rant, where you contradict yourself every other paragraph and even if I proved you wrong, you wouldn't admit it.

The Haye thread you made was misleading. Most people probably did find it boring. I'd never watch it again myself, either, but was it worse than Dirrell's performance? Obviously not.

What was embarrassing, was reading you say how bad Haye's performance was and then admitting you'd never seen the fight. How can you expect to be taken seriously?

I did score Froch/Dirrell. 120-107.

It's more like Mike Tyson ignoring some random, worthless journalist who is trying to get his attention by insulting him.

 

You had Calzaghe on you're list. Calzaghe isnt even ranked in the top 100 as an ATG.

Please fool, dont talk about comparing greats, because then its really not close.

I easily pulled off a higher percentage per capita of greats then you were able to. And your ran like a *****.

As I've said before, my state has more greats then your entire country.

Nope. I asked specifically whether it was worse then Dirrells performance. And many said Yes. And mostly becuase Dirrell was a young guy and inexperienced. Dont try to twist it you limey *******, it is what it is.

Scorecard yuck mouth. Not score.

:good

 

MichiganWarrior:

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Calzaghe is clearly top 100.

Like I said, the per capita list you produced was not as good. Which is presumably why you listed 3 foreign fighters. Maybe if you consider Azumah Nelson, Manny Pacquiao and Julio Cesar Chavez next time, your list will be better.

Idiot.

No, you didn't. In fact, in your opening post, you never mentioned Dirrell once, so this idea of a comparison is bull****. I'm not twisting anything, it's clear you weren't comparing the two.

You really need me to break down what a 120-107 scorecard looks like?

 

The sad part is that Dirrell's team better yet his brother or whom ever was in that video that says "I want to make money too " could be the cancer in is team !

 

Nope. Not according to anyone on this forum or else he'd be an ATG which nobody considers him.

Name them.

Nope It was either me or you who tried to make the comparison, and if memory serves you got slaughtered.

Feel free. I'd like to see you not be a ***** for once and actually attempt to defend the bull**** you say. Post a scorecard and I'll break it down round by round why you are wrong. And considering you had Froch winning every round you'll be wrong alot.

 

:ban:fireSomeone ban this disgraceful troll PishicuntWarrior for the sake of ESB. He is nothing but a Dirrell-fellating disgrace. He has already booked stage-side seats at the Emmys, Golden Globes, and Academy Awards in order to stalk his cowardy custard hero, Andre "auditioning for a bit-part in The Matrix" Dirrell.

PishicuntWarrior will be seen blowing kisses to The Gaytrix as he makes his acceptance speech for the Biggest Glass Jawed ***** of 2010 award. :roflatsch

 

Dirrell ran, fell down on canvas, complained, held. Dirrell's acting became too prefabricated.