Crawford’s Canelo win vs Duran’s Barkley win, which was more impressive?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Devon, Sep 23, 2025 at 4:51 AM.


Whose win was more impressive?

  1. Crawford’s win was more impressive

    21.4%
  2. Duran’s win was more impressive

    78.6%
  1. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,436
    5,620
    Dec 31, 2018
    Both at the same age, although the opponent’s age was different, Canelo was 35 and Barkley was 27, but Canelo is more skilled than Barkley.

    Which win was more impressive?
     
  2. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,210
    19,493
    Jul 25, 2015
    Duran imo. Crawford's win is class but the weight jump is deceptive, given his history of weight cutting, in ring weights and the fact that Canelo is also a smaller SMW. Canelo and Crawford are around the same size. Meanwhile, Duran was a legitimate 25lbs heavier than his best weight division going against a big middleweight (for the time) in Barkley.

    Stylistically, Duran was also able to beat Barkley in exchanges up close and inside which is insane to me. I will concede that Canelo is obviously better than Barkley as a boxer but the main hype for the win is the weight jump which to me is a bit smoke and mirrors imo.
     
    BobD99, Man_Machine, Jobo1878 and 2 others like this.
  3. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,325
    4,183
    Aug 2, 2013
    Duran started at 119lb. Barkley was a monster.
     
  4. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,448
    1,824
    Sep 9, 2011
    crawford.

    both of the bigger guys were limited. barkley more so.

    big fan of iran but that's the truth.
     
  5. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,032
    8,064
    Jun 10, 2024
    I give the edge to Duran b/c he appeared to be on his last legs heading into the Barkley fight, whereas Crawford was still a candidate for p4p #1. Myself & others genuinely felt sorry for Duran before that fight.
     
    roughdiamond and Man_Machine like this.
  6. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,729
    4,463
    Jul 14, 2009
    I say the Barley win is more impressive, because Duran faced huge physcial disadvantages. Duran was 5ft.7 and Barkely 6ft1 (looked like a light heavyweight). Crawford had the height and reach advantage over Canelo. Also 37 on 1989 is not exactly 37 in 2025. Today fighters age better.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  7. Lonsdale81

    Lonsdale81 Member Full Member

    415
    614
    May 19, 2025
    Barkley had just KOd ATG Thomas Hearns.. Canelo had just chased no name William Scull around for 12.. It's obviously Duran. Canelo is in poor form these days, he can't pull the trigger & hasn't stopped anyone since 2021. Also Barkley was legit much bigger than Duran.. 6'1 with a 74 inch reach. Canelo isn't bigger than Crawsnac.
     
  8. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,688
    9,867
    Jun 9, 2010
    Agreed. The idea of Duran winning felt like a flight of fancy and then his ability to call on all of his resources and set the scene of a competitive bout became quite palpable.
     
  9. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,080
    1,302
    Jan 1, 2011
    Crawford. Duran barely squeaked by Barkley and you can make a case that Barkley won. Crawford won decisively against a much more highly regarded champion.