Crawford’s Canelo win vs Duran’s Barkley win, which was more impressive?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Devon, Sep 23, 2025 at 4:51 AM.


Whose win was more impressive?

  1. Crawford’s win was more impressive

    31.0%
  2. Duran’s win was more impressive

    69.0%
  1. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,322
    11,715
    Mar 19, 2012
    Both super impressive performances, both upsets.

    Crawford made it look easy, he was dominant. My view of Canelo is the same as before. He is a very good fighter. Not great though. I thought he fought a decent fight. He threw everything he has at Terance.

    Duran ofcourse would fight just about anyone, anytime. Both of these guys ask for nothing as far as concessions. It probably never crossed his mind. Props to Crawford for doing what he had to do.

    Both of them hurt the bigger man. Duran messed Barkley up in the later rounds to pull it out. Crawford hurt Canelo at least twice. That wasnt supposed to happen.

    Crawford took a big risk going into an unchartered weight class not even close to his prime division. I won't throw any shade on Crawford because I heard 'there's weight classes for a reason' too many times in the last couple of weeks.

    If he's in the conversation with Duran that is a good place to be.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  2. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,328
    4,193
    Aug 2, 2013
    Barkley ran Mike Nunn to the wire a few months later, when Nunn was being widely touted the best lb4lb boxer on earth at that time
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  3. slipperypete

    slipperypete New Member Full Member

    5
    3
    Yesterday
    I would say Crawfords win was better, and I never felt Duran REALLY won that fight. It was a great fight, and a great effort by Duran, but I always felt Barkley edged him - even with the knockdown. Thay had to give it to Duran to keep the Leonard vs. Duran 3 fight alive. Too much money at stake! Great question!
     
    Homericlegend03 likes this.
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    I agree Barkley should have received the decision, but still say Duran. He was almost 10 years past his prime and fought a prime opponent who was much bigger. And Barkley came off a win against Hearns and would soon after pushing Nunn really close (as well noted by Bulldog). He wasn't as good as Canelo but a good fighter nonetheless.

    Even though Crawford is older than Canelo, most were in agreement already before the fight that Canelo had slipped more. And much was made of the Crawford going up two weights, but he is naturally about Canelo's size. A MW who managed to boil himself down to WW for a good number of years while Canelo is a small SMW. Still very impressive, but Duran going toe to toe with the much fresher and bigger Barkley is just the more surreal experience for me.
     
    slipperypete likes this.
  5. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,238
    7,118
    Sep 11, 2018
    Crawford’s, just. He definitely appeared more “prime” and the physical mismatch was greater but Canelo’s status was superior to Barkley’s and Crawford absolutely dominated.
     
  6. surfinghb

    surfinghb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,637
    17,914
    Aug 26, 2017
    Duran. Crawford victory was an easy call. Duran was in the sport for sooo many years, He was 37 Barkley 28