Losing doesn’t disqualify a boxer from the p4p rankings. There’s been boxers who have more than one loss and were p4p #1. The loss was over 3 years ago and since then, Loma hasn’t lost a round against top competition. The level of dominance he’s exhibited has been exceptional. Loma can’t be faulted for not getting revenge or attempting to avenge the loss to Salido. They actively sought the rematch but Salido rejected the offer. It’s hard to make a grown man fight if it’s not in his heart. Bud has a unique perspective and I don’t take it lightly. But there are others who are just as close to the sport who aren’t in agreement with him on this. But everyone has different opinions and we won’t always find common ground. But I try to be understanding of everyone’s opinions if it’s reasonable. I disagree there’s no arguments to qualify and quantify Loma being p4p #1. The metrics are clear in ranking fighters as p4p and Loma checks all of the boxes
I have mikey garcia higher p4p than both lomachenko and crawford. Not more skilled than those fighters but better wins.
So Loma draws and makes more money? Go crawl back in your hole. You guys only morally support your guys. If it wasn’t the case, G and Loma would be the cash cows of the sport. Not AJ and Canelo. Now go do something productive like not following me here and in the lounge. Another clown who always just wants my attention. Also whose the guy fighting midgets again. Inactive fighters coming off draws and losses moving up lmao. Nice try dude. Get a life.
Lomachenko beat Salido, but was cheated by Salido's judges and the most corrupt referee in boxing history.................although is was a split decision, I have Lomachenko beating Salido, they tried to get a rematch, but Salido refused, Salido lost big money by refusing.....................
Oh! really? Well I perfectly remember you slurping while licking postol's balls, telling us that he was "The Light Welterweight version of Wladimir Klitschko". The very moment he got destroyed by crawford, suddenly, you "hate" postol. ROFL!!!! Please, dont lie to us, be a man, dude. You dont like my nick? oh, I'm so sad... T_T, on the other hand yours is awesome, Cletus.
Yeah, I'm shifty or slippery like that. I have a history of being chameleonic with certain fighters. I can like an root for someone before one fight, and completely turn on them by the next one. If you think I like Postol, you should check out my full scale anti-Postol meltdown after he stopped Matthysse. My name is Christian, hence the CST, so nice try jerkoff, you're not the first one who's tried to use being from Florida against me, well, I'm from the part where the Cuban you so love dear... lives. ie, no rednecks anywhere in sight.
Neither Lomachenko and Crawford brings money to the table. They aren't known by casual fans. Which isn't a big deal for Lomachenko because he is from Ukraine and he barely speaks English, but Crawford is American yet nobody cares about him in his home country, that is way more pathetic. What is the BS talk about financially supporting fighters? Did you buy Crawford - Postol? Umm no you didn't, you were nowhere to be found in the RBR... Once again you tried to talk **** but it backfired on you dumb dumb. As for who is fighting midgets, the best name on Crawford resume was a midget compared to him. Gamboa also never achieved anything at lightweight (where Crawford fought him) but lost to a noname bum. Crawford walks around at 177 between fights, he is a classic weight bully so far. This content is protected
I used it just because I know it annoys you I dont even understand the freaking cletus joke, I'm not from the US.