Now you are making up crap. I didn't even pick Postol to beat him. I was NEVER overly impressed with Postol. Log off
Ignore the fool, he just levels the same false accusation towards anyone who dares question his idol. I wasn't even on these boards at the time he fought Postol, yet it doesn't stop him and the same other crawbully fanboys from accusing me of picking Pistol to beat him. They have to build up Crawford's poor opponents otherwise the emperor will be seen with no clothes.
Lol Lomachenko has accomplished more in the sport of boxing then your new little hero that you're riding the bandwagon of And after he defeats your other hopeful Rigoblin... Loma WILL be ranked #1 or depending on how bad GGG beats Canelo... MAYBE #2. Fun times ahead!
Why should I explain something I never claimed? You rated Crawford highly so you should answer this question: Exactly WHO has Crawford beaten? His best wins are Viktor Postol and Felix Diaz. Are Postol and Diaz better than Walters and Russell Jr? "Lol..."
Loma can be consider p4p no1 if you based them on eye ball test. Me personally I don't really care if it differ one or two spots
I like Crawford and am glad he's coming along. I think Bob is matching him well. But let's be real. A p4p no. 1 who hasn't fought anybody? Who struggled with Ray Beltran? Okay.... In fact, Gatekeeper Beltran is the best name on his resume. Couldn't we wait until he has an impressive win before saying he beats 1. Everyone at 147 2. Everyone at 154 3. Prime Tszyu 4. Prime Pacquiao 5. Ray Robinson And all the other claims his fans are now making on this site? Let's see him fight Mikey Garcia or someone else of p4p calibre before calling him a top p4p fighter.
Atlas is heavily weighing skillset. Hard to argue with him on that factor. But there's this thing called resume. Ward, without a doubt, has the strongest resume on the P4P list.
That's ok. He was saying Walters would "Give Loma dat work!" and he also said Brook would "Decapitate and decimate GGG" He got those wrong didn't he?!
Gamboa is criticized for being too small and Indongo for not knowing how to box. So what is the criticism for Postol?
He rates Crawford above Lomachenko, so I guess that means Crawford should have the better wins out of the two... Yet he doesn't.