Crawford/Postol PPV 60$ HD, will you buy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by abuffy, May 10, 2016.


  1. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Will you buy? Btw, presser started. You can watch on Top Rank TV.
     
  2. The Shockmaster

    The Shockmaster SOG has 4 children...he pulls out of nothing banned Full Member

    23,047
    1,067
    Apr 19, 2014
  3. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,602
    Jul 22, 2004
  4. Alabama BBQ

    Alabama BBQ Guest

    No I ain't paying for Ramirez-Dominik Britsch as co-main event :patsch :patsch
     
  5. Alabama BBQ

    Alabama BBQ Guest

    Jake Donovan ‏JakeNDaBox_v2 10m10 minutes ago

    Full PPV u/c for #CrawfordPostol: Gilberto Ramirez vs. Dominik Britsch, Oscar Valdez vs. Manuel Rueda, Jose Benavidez vs. Francisco Santana

    Arum you idiot :lol: :huh
     
  6. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    31,539
    7,519
    Oct 5, 2009
    yes but its weird seeing any remotely competitive fight being ppv

    it should be reserved for big fights
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,376
    Nov 30, 2006
    Probably be my last ever purchase of a boxing PPV...or for a long time anyway.
     
  8. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    I agree that PPV's should only be reserved for big fights. Basically, if you are known by casual fans then put it on PPV because it's the casuals that make PPV's successful anyways... but if you aren't that well-known outside boxing, no matter how good the fight is or how highly rated you are, then you shouldn't be on PPV.
     
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,012
    17,491
    Jul 19, 2004
    In your opinion, what made GGG-Lemieux a "big fight" in comparison to Crawford-Postol?
     
  10. TheVrominator

    TheVrominator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,804
    7
    Jan 31, 2013
    Good
    This content is protected
    but for $60? No way.
     
  11. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Lmao, you left out the rest of my comment where I explained what qualifies for a PPV.

    GGG's PPV was his test to see how well he's known by casuals. We found out not that much. His PPV showed he needs that marquee name (like ehem Canelo) if he wants to crossover to that next level where you can be on PPV.

    Also, they had to put it on PPV because of the amount of money Lemieux was asking. Similar to how Postol/Crawford has to be on PPV due to HBO's budget cuts.

    GGG isn't big enough to carry a PPV by himself yet. He's a boxing star but not a PPV star. He's on the track to become one, but he needs his "Oscar De La Hoya". I've always said that.
     
  12. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,898
    8,374
    Jun 22, 2015
    Everyone needs a crossover fight but non exist for anyone. Time for these guys to make themselves Superstars.

    Look at Broner. Never ever faced an elite fighter once but everyone knows him. That Maidana fight was almost PPV before Haymon changed it. He used social media and got the attention he wanted.

    A promoter can do only so much. Its like being on a record label nowadays. You have to sell yourself too.
     
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,012
    17,491
    Jul 19, 2004
    It's still not clear to me how you differentiate the two fights.

    Are you saying neither was a big fight? That both were undeserving for PPV, but they were testing the waters in an effort to try and push new stars over? Or are you saying something else? Or... ?

    I only ask because I seem to recall you being rather ecstatic with regards to Golovkin-Lemieux, but IMHO - there is little difference between the 2 match-ups, and neither were what I would personally describe as "big fights" in the PPV-worthy sense.

    :smoke