Crawford might snipe Spence's second orbital if they fought, his movement and accuracy when he figures the other guy out is superb.
Let's not say that about Porter of all people, he gets KDed on seemingly light shots but can take huge shots without budging, a case of loss in rhythm it seems.
Possible but very unlikely. Spence is southpaw, technically better. Hit’s harder and knows how to work the body. He will slow Crawford down. Crawford won’t be able to land his counter’s walking backwards against a southpaw. Just comes down to styles
Exciting fight but it doesn’t move the needle for Crawford. Porter already lost 3 times to Brook, Thurman and Spence. He’s 34 with a style that doesn’t age well and last guy he fought was a gimme. I had it 5-4 Crawford going to 10th but lot of close rounds. Good win. Fun fight. But it’s not a statement type fight people want to make it out to be.
It was an OK fight. "Exciting" fights don't have your female guests asking "why are they holding so much"?
hahahahaha dude I was legit watching the fight with a chick and she asked the same thing at one point.. had to explain the different reasons a hold may happen
Yes he did. I knew the excuses & complaints from the haters who picked Porter to win were gonna be inevitable. They can't just take the L & give the man his props.