Number 1 according to who? Because he beat Ruslan . Oh wait it's because he went life and death with molina right. Crawford's last 5 opponents COMPLETELY take a dump on what postol has done. Postol has a win over a guy Garcia already thoroughly outboxed 2 years before , and you suck his **** like he's even close to the crawford level.
You didnt let me know if I could be an honorary El. Can I please be a piece of **** like the rest of you els?
HBO knows Postol is dangerous if he wasent you bet your **** they would get Crawford to take that belt to make Crawford more marketable Postol is a very high risk tho
Top rank makes awful fights. They're no Haymon, they're scared of even little risks. It's a shame really, I hope crawford goes to PBC.
So what has Golovkin done at 160? All of Crawfords opponents at 140 besides maybe Jean(we'll compare it to monroe) were top 10. Funny how you pick and choose when to give credit. Oh wait, Crawford isn't enough of a brother, so I wouldn't defend him right.
Top rank was involved in better quality fights then Haymon in 2015 neither are doing squat so far in 2016
When in doubt play the race card. Ellerbe Psssh... I'm still wondering how you claim you're not racist but support a racist lol
Not playing the race card, it's just funny how you suck on ggg's nuts for his awful opposition, but then you criticize crawford's last couple opponents when they were all top 10. I do agree with you though, Crawford needs to fight Postol, that's the only fihgt I want to see at 140.
I know the difference but thanks for correcting me on a boxing forum. Now I'll try to be easy on you since you're sensitive but really who has Crawford beat at 140 to warrant such hype from you?