Crawford was just warming up and not out of first gear and he had him on ***** street. I do think Spence is better though, and he would have finished Khan in 2 rounds max.
Ball is in Spence's court. My prediction? He'll continue ducking. He knows he can't KO Crawford and he sure as hell can't outbox him.
alexander is a ****ing tough *******. listen i never said you didnt know boxing ive heard this alot lately, i must ruffle a few feathers, but i reckon you will soon find you know **** all about the sport. the last paragraph is emotional baffle, spence beat a p4p boxer 12-0, lot more than crawford has done, and no im not talking about if you manage to grip this, that spence goes up and beats 154-160lbers, im saying he beats terence at 147lbs. ****wit.
Khan's not as fast as he used to be, but he's faster than Spence. Crawford would haul ass like he did against Postol, take zero risks and pick him apart from the outside.
Oh, now it's "Spence beats Crawford" when in your OP, you stated Spence would 'KILL' Crawford and be pressed for murder charges? I'm taking you up on your original post. The idea that Spence even KO's Crawford, is baffling to me but what you said, is even worse. Since there is no logic to that statement (as I've already proven). Forget boxing! You need to take some logic courses since it doesn't seem like your strong suite.
sorry if i made a slightly dramatic thread with slightly dramatic predictions, im so sorry fernando. Alright Spence KO's Crawford inside 8 rounds, he doesnt literally kill him, because you know its in a ring with officials and i think the ref will step in before that happened. You absolute donut.
i dont mind either, i prefer spence, but either way i think its a super fight. and there arent many around to be made atm.
Spence couldn't cleanly KO small washed up Khan leftover in Lamont Peterson and a career 135 pounder in Mikey Garcia. Therefore, he isn't KO'ing a superior Crawford who is superior to all those guys. I challenge you to make a case for any of those guys being more durable or more skilled than Crawford.
he stopped brook. brook > crawford. also you ever think that given the moment, the time, that top fighters bring out the best in each other, and spences best is better than crawfords best. spence did stop peterson, end of line. garcia is tough as hell in my believes, crawford would have been stopped brutally taking that many shots. Okay?
You mean the same Brook who was coming off a career ending eye-injury? Seriously? Are you seriously using that as an argument? Is Crawford coming off such a devastating injury? Didn't think so! Spence got a retirement stoppage against Peterson, couldn't cleanly knock him out. Which speaks volumes about Spence's lack of power to do the same to a prime Crawford. You still have to present a case on HOW Garcia is tougher than Crawford. You are aware that Garcia has been dropped before whilst Crawford has not? So what's your next excuse? Garcia isn't as tough as you think he is. It's more down to Spence's featherfisted lack of power as to why he couldn't even drop Garcia, not Garcia's toughness.
we will soon see mr man. thats all im going to say. mr fernando you are a prophet get yourself in kirks league, you know alot about boxing, carry on with yourself.