youve read his posts, you think he knows anything bout fighting? im old, but i got serious hands. he would have to run and hope i keel over out of exhaustion from chasing him, lol.
One thing to me about Crawford, when you’re talking junk (then and now) about beating the likes of Gamboa…. boasting over an out-gunned opponent is kind of wilder-esque to me, sign of a guy who hasn’t fought the right comp and is confident to the point of clueless. Just my opinion
Well said. I just don't see Spence having a plan b, while I see Crawford having a plan b, c, d and e.
Before the accident I favored Spence, now it's close, but should be a clear victory for Crawford. Spence for the most part only has one strategy, forward, and moves back in straight lines. Crawford is the "smarter" fighter and uses more movement and angles, but he is still going to get beat up. I wasn't impressed with how Crawford fought Porter. If he gets hit like that against Spence he might wilt before breaking down Spence. It's going to be a close fight, but I give Crawford the upper hand.
If Crawford starts early (which he never does), he'll more than likely get enough of a lead to beat Spence. BUT If Crawford starts late, trying to "collect" data, Spence is going to streamroll him. People keep thinking that Spence isn't versatile or doesn't have tools...he can box (M.Garcia) & bang (S.Porter) or mix both (Y. Ugas)...The man is a former Olympian & he has a better chin than Crawford. Crawford is faster but Spence timing & pressure will negate all that. While Crawford doesn't have 1 punch power, he is the best finisher in boxing...IF he hurt Spence, he'll get him out of there, no questions asked.